Toads, and other Snapethings
Porphyria
porphyria at mindspring.com
Sat Feb 23 09:05:19 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 35626
Good Evening Folks. Just a quickie on the subject of Trevor, Snape and
so forth.
Judy was contesting Cindy's rather uncharitable suggestion about Snape
and the toad:
> And Cindy says that Snape was trying to destroy the Longbottoms when
> he made Trevor drink Neville's Shrinking Solution:
> > Snape would be perfectly willing to force Neville to brew the potion
> > that kills the last hope that Neville will have his parents back.
Judy continued:
> Creative, but I don't think it's true. First of all, I think other
> kid *do* carry their pets around. Scabbers was often in Ron's pocket
> or backpack.
> <snip excellent reasons for why Neville wouldn't be carrying around the
> souls of his parents in toad form>
> And most importantly, I'm sure that my dearest Snape is a nice guy and
> would have given Trevor an antidote if Trevor had gotten sick.
Well put, Judy. Of course he would have, he's not *that* horrid. He's
just a little horrid. ;-)
The thing that seems to get lost in the discussion about the Trevor
incident is the extent to which Snape's object in this scene is largely
Hermione, or to put it more accurately, Gryffindor entrapment. Snape is
ridiculing Neville's potion, which presumably he does every class, and
Hermione pipes up and begs him to let her help Neville fix it. Snape
reacts with his usual hostility, but notice he doesn't threaten the toad
until after Hermione offers her help. At this point Neville becomes even
more desperate and *begs* her to help him. And how can she refuse him?
She has to save his toad! Snape has effectively pinned her into a corner
where she feels she has no choice but to defy his own warning, then he
gets to deduct points from Gryffindor because he manipulated her into
doing exactly what he wanted her to do. Compare this to the first
Potions class in PS/SS where Snape deducts a point from Harry for *not*
helping Neville with his potion. Snape's interest is in knocking points
off the Gryffindors, not in poisoning defenseless animals. Furthermore,
the Trevor scene should be read as yet another example of Snape's
propensity toward theater; he's trying to frighten rather than harm. By
the end of class, Neville's potion has already resumed it's appropriate
color of green, so Snape no doubt surmises that Hermione has succeeded
in getting it fixed. I think he would have been astonished if the potion
hadn't worked properly.
Not that he probably isn't a little disgusted that Neville can't seem to
do anything on his own.
This leads me to Brewpub's recent post which concludes:
> So here is the lesson I am trying to impart: Snape is the best friend
> the Big Three have. Pampering them will not help them at all, making
> them tough, smart, skilled, and capable will. It's a tough world, and
> requires tough people.
This is true; while IRL Snape would be a nightmare of a grade school
teacher, in this context he's the perfect local adversary for a trio of
would-be Voldemort-vanquishers.
I had more to say, but it's been a busy week and I don't have the energy
or focus to post more tonight. So I'll use this space to declare my
tentative support for George, and you can also sign me up for Eloise's
Evil Fudge camp. I'll come over with an industrial sized case of
marshmallows. I'll even bring the spits.
~~Porphyria
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive