AK Stealing Souls
grey_wolf_c
greywolf1 at jazzfree.com
Wed Feb 27 20:36:27 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 35819
--- In HPforGrownups at y..., "ftah3" <ftah3 at y...> wrote:
<snip: theory on inner workings of AK>
> I guess I'm suggesting is that perhaps the evil involved in the use
> of AK isn't a one-way street. Perhaps it is an active evil, just as
> the mother-love that saved Harry had to become an active thing also ~
> it had to become a power in and of itself, affecting in this case
> Harry, in order to work. Soooo...what if part of the reason that
> Voldemort survived the rebounded AK, and survived in such mysterious
> and bizarre form is because his use of this Unforgivable Curse
> actually, physically & magically, twisted his very being in some
> way? And the Unforgivable classification is due in part to
> foreknowledge of this eventuality?
>
> Mahoney
I'm not altoghether sure I've followed your theory from the beggining
to the end, so feel free to disagree with what I'm about to say.
The last question is easy: No, there was no foreknowledge of what
happened to Voldie after the rebounded curse hit him, since two
first-timers occoured at that time: for the first time someone survived
to the AK curse, and, thus, for the first time someone was hit by a
rebounded AK course. If there was no foreknowledge, it cannot be part
of the definition of "unforgivable curse". Anyway, even allowing it to
be true (as in "it was known by the sages of ancient times" or
whatever), I don't see how that would tie with the other two
unforgivable curses, which are not known to rebound.
Of course, this train of thought takes us back to square one: what
common characteristic have those three curses have that no other spell
has? For some time (two or three pages) I thought they were unstopable,
but we've since been told that any amount of people can throw the
Imperious curse off. Thus, my on theory (a variation of the original)
right now says that "unforgivable curses are those spells that cannot
be countered by any magical mean". No amount of wand-weaving will stop
any of the three from reaching it's destiny (phisical means are still
useful, like getting behind a gravestone, as are psiquical means, like
the one seen in the Imperious). Harry has never told us if he's learnt
shield magic (protective magic), but I assume some must exists, since
all wizards have innate shielding capabilities (à la bouncing
Longbottom), and it seems only natural that when they started
developing magical capabilities in antiquity they started by
strengthening their own innate powers. Anyway, the theory is still at
infant stage, so feel free to disagree or colaborate.
Hope that helps
Grey Wolf
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive