V - the end of bad wizards?/Harry's fate

Katze jdumas at kingwoodcable.com
Tue Jan 1 21:56:40 UTC 2002


No: HPFGUIDX 32507

Margaret Dean wrote:
> 
> Elena Del Moral wrote:
> 
> > If Harry and friends , finally get rid of Voldemort forever , then there would
> > be no aurors , because they would have nothing to fight against.
> 
> Oh ho, don't kid yourself!  Before Voldemort (just as an example)
> there was Grindelwald, and after Voldemort there will be other
> Dark Wizards, you can bet.  Voldie's just the latest and
> greatest.  Wizards are, after all, only human . . .

I have to agree...there will be more bad wizards. I'm a person who would
like to see Harry survive relatively undamaged, and I'm constantly
trying to find a light at the end of the tunnel. I know that people are
going to tease me that he might die, but trust me, Rowling does a fine
job by herself getting me worked up into a frenzy.

So I'm sitting here, trying to figure out if there is a way for Harry to
survive, and I think I found a way. Dumbledore defeated the great wizard
Gindelwald, and he seems to be relatively unscathed, so why can't Harry
have this too? I don't expect Harry to come out undamaged, but he
certainly could be content in the end. I can also accept a little lunacy
for Harry as I think this is what makes Dumbledore much more endearing.
He's perfectly functional, rational, and powerful, yet he hums to
himself and takes delight in little things. I'd love this for Harry. But
Harry can't be this if D is still around. Therefore...D must die. ;-)

On that note...I shall go eat some chocolate.

-Katze




More information about the HPforGrownups archive