Snape & DADA: hearsay, or a true slight?
finwitch
finwitch at yahoo.com
Mon Jan 7 14:55:28 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 32924
I think Snape has applied for it, and as a former DE he does know the
business (which both he and Dumbledore know).
Quirrell (faints after mentioning a troll) and Lockhart (risks
students, concentrates on his own ego, and in the end, obliviates
himself with a broken wand he stole from a student) *were* totally
unqualified!
This WOULD piss Snape off - DADA is important, and Dumbledore
choosing an incompetent teacher instead of him who at least would
know what he's talking about...
Lupin was excellent at it - too bad he was a werewolf.
Crouch/Moody was good, too - and Moody as an ex-auror knew more than
well the business.
However, Snape does except perfection from the beginning. He has no
patience for errors (and students DO make errors). This would cause a
student to hesitate without full knowledge, knowing how Snape is. It
is good when dealing with potions, where the slightest error is
dangerous.
In DADA, the courage to at least try is more important than
perfection of a spell. Just watch Ron use the ONLY spell he knows
along with Harry to defeat a troll, Harry using the only advantage he
had when fighting Quirrell, his incomplete, but successful enough a
Patronus etc.
Most important qualification for a DADA teacher, IMO, is the ability
to encourage students. This is something Snape lacks, and would,
probably, be more likely to discourage them. Even having a teacher
without full knowledge is better, as if a student can i.e. defeat a
troll when his teacher faints at it's mention, what could be a better
encouragement than that?
I think Snape doesn't understand that, but Dumbledore does. Besides,
Snape knows his potions, and Dumbledore would have a great deal of
trouble to find someone to fulfil THAT potition if Snape got to teach
DADA - I doubt that Dumbledore sees any subject thought in HIS school
to be without merit...
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive