Immortality / LOLLIPOPS / Gay / Fawcett / Muggle Studies
catlady_de_los_angeles
catlady at wicca.net
Sun Jan 13 02:53:56 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 33296
Mercia Meglet wrote:
> it is clear to me that Voldemort's obsession is not just the
> standard evil dictator's aim of world domination but to achieve
> immortality in this world and to pass on that to his selected
> followers.
I believe that Voldemort has made it clear in canon that he has
worked very hard to gain immortality for himself. I suspect that he
has promised immortality to his followers, because that is one very
effective way of recruiting certain people, but I suspect that he
has no intention of actually doing it.
> I can't imagine she would call him theft of death without good
> reason.
As you suggest, he could be Thief from Death or Flight from Death
because of his quest for immortality, to steal his life away from
death. He could also be Flight of Death because he swoops down on
people and kills them, or Thief of Death because he has 'stolen'
(from God's Angel of Death, from Nature, from Fate, whatever) the
power to give death (kill people). I perceive a contradiction between
his desire to never die and his impulse to destroy pretty much
everything he comes across: he seems not to have thought of how will
he live without a support system (environment, food, air, servants,
etc).
Catherine grandisiowa wrote:
> Not likely, given Snapes's connections, that he's going to be
> attracted to a Mudblood.
There is no evidence that Snape is opposed to Muggle-born witches and
wizards: I can't think of any example of him picking worse on a
Muggle-born than a Pureblood of the same House and similar Potions
ability. I don't believe he joined the Death Eaters because he wanted
to purify the wizarding world of Muggle genes: he may have been
hoping to gain power, wealth, or immortality; he may have been going
along with his friends out of loyalty; perhaps he welcomed any
opportunity to oppose James...
Andrew mrgrrragh (Mr. Grrragh? related to Aragh the English wolf?)
wrote:
> Are any of the HP characters gay? And will JKR write about that?
That's a question that, historically, has started a number of feuds
and flame wars. I suspect that JKR won't write about it, to avoid
conflict with upset Muggles. However, she could, without being
extraneous.
Me, I think it would be hysterically funny to have scene where all
the Weasleys (and Harry and Hermione and maybe Viktor) are at the
Burrow and Fleur turns up on some excuse but really to chase Bill,
and Bill is the only male not affected by her: Ron and Fred and
George and Charlie are blatantly following her around with their
tongues hanging out, Percy (and Viktor, if present) are always making
excuses to wander up to her and start bragging, Arthur (whenever in
her presence) gazes at at her with a reminiscent smile, Harry stares
at her with a stunned expression whenever she's around --- and Bill
makes the same polite conversation as with any guest. She finally
corners Bill alone and asks what the hell is going on, and he
explains: "I like you just fine as a friend, and I know you're a very
pretty woman (I'm not blind), but I've never been interested in women
that way; I've always been gay."
Which could be followed, later in the book, by a scene where Molly is
nagging Bill to find a nice young witch to marry and settle down and
give her grandchildren, and he gets exasperated enough that he
finally tells her: "I've already found the person with whom I want to
spend the rest of my life, and it isn't a witch." Molly assumes it's
a Muggle girl and gets angry that Bill apparently thought that she
would be prejudiced against a Muggle daughter-in-law. When Bill
replies: "Not a Muggle," Molly gets even worse distressed and gasps:
"Not a Veela!" Finally, Bill tells her: "Not a Muggle, not a Veela,
not a witch: a wizard named Jacques Chemaly from Lebanon, whom I met
in Egypt." Then we get to see the rest of the Weasleys getting
ddjusted to this new information, and it's Harry and Hermione who
lecture them on gay rights (which Harry will have seen on the
television news while at the Dursleys, and approve of because the
Dursleys so loudly disapprove).
Hollydaze wrote:
> we keep seeing the name Fawcett mentioned (snip)
> the Fawcetts Live somewhere near the Weasleys (snip)
> a "Miss Fawcett" at the Duelling club (snip)
> There is a Fawcett in the bushes that Snape blasts at the Yule
> Ball, a female Fawcett who is in Hufflepuff. (snip)
> This one also mentions a Fawcett in Hufflepuff
Your last example is a Miss Fawcett of RAVENCLAW: when Fred and
George try to use Aging Potion to cross the Age Line to put their
names in the Goblet of Fire (which raises a whole 'nother question:
how would one of them function as Champion without the other?) and
grow long beards, Dumbledore says: "I suggest you both go up to Madam
Pomfrey. She is already tending to Miss Fawcett, of Ravenclaw, and Mr
Summers, of Hufflepuff, both of whom decided to age themselves up a
little, too."
I believe that the two Miss Fawcetts are sisters and the Fawcetts who
live near the Weasleys are their parents. I have invented a whole
fanfic for them: Miss Fawcett of Hufflepuff is a sixth year when
caught in the rosebush and her name is Ellie (short for Electra
Elizabeth) and her boyfriend Stebbins of Ravenclaw is also a sixth
year and his name is Andy (short for Androcles Josephus). Miss
Fawcett of Ravenclaw is one year younger, a fifth-year at that time,
thus a roommate of Cho Chang, and she is Cho's very best friend and
they are both mad for Quidditch even tho' Cho made the team and Mary
didn't. The implausible list of names who checked out Quidditch
Through the Ages on implausible dates are all students who are mad
for Quidditch, so the Fawcett on that list must be Mary, altho' the
initial on the list is S. She must be going by her middle name due to
hatred of her first name. What name that starts with S would be so
hated? Sexagunda! ANY young girl would HATE being called Sex-again-da.
And I decided that Mr. Summers of Hufflepuff must be Mary's
Hufflepuff boyfriend Sylvanus (Van for short), whom I had already
invented for the fic but not given a last name yet. My excuse is that
a stereotypic Hufflepuff would not use magic to break a rule unless
urged to do so by a close friend, so the two violators mentioned by
Dumbledore were a team, not separate incidents.
Ev vy wrote:
> (I don't see Slytherins willingly attending Muggle studies)
Muggle Studies is said to be an easy course, so I imagine Crabbe and
Goyle are taking it while Draco is taking Arithmancy and Ancient
Runes.
> I don't know British law, but in Poland parents who don't send
> their children to school may get arrested, as learning is
> obligatory. OK, I've heard about home-teaching or rather
> self-education, but I'm not sure if it's acceptable in the UK or
> the USA. (snip) But when those kids are accepted to Hogwarts,
> they disappear form the Muggle world. So what happens? Are there
> any legal consequences?
There is home-schooling in USA. I believe the wizarding folk are
experienced and competent at using magic to get around Muggle laws. I
believe that Wizard-born kids (and that might apply to half-and-
half kids from intact marriages) aren't ever mentioned in any Muggle
records (not born in Muggle hospital, no Muggle birth certificate,
etc) until they decide they want to live as Muggles for a while (as
an adventure) and then all the paperwork (and computer records) they
need magically appear in the right places (birth certificate, school
records, tax records, whatever is needed to get on National Health,
etc). Muggle-born kids who go to the wizarding world would start
having documentation in the Muggle world, but maybe it would all
vanish during the school year (so authorities never knew they existed
so never wondered why they weren't in school) but re-appear during
summer holidays. If Hermione decided to go to St. Andrews after
Hogwarts, she would be supplied with complete records of gone to a
foreign school but gotten plenty of O-levels and A-levels.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive