Utopian vision vs realism in fiction
sirius_3lack
sirius_3lack at yahoo.co.uk
Tue Jan 15 09:35:20 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 33471
"jrober4211" <midwife34 at a...> wrote:
I doubt seriously that JKR
> conciously decided while writing the Potter stories " Gee, I think
> I'll write a series in which traditional gender roles are
portrayed."
>
> Jo Ellen
I disagree.
Of course the text isn't just what the author intended (it also
reflects her cultural background, assumptions, and biases - known or
unknown)
However I think there must have been a concious choice involved in
making the hero (Harry), the side kick (Ron), The most senior "good"
figure (Dumbledore), the most senior "evil" figure (You-know-who) and
the higest ranked wizard (Fudge) all male characters.
But this could be for a number of reasons:
1. This is the way JKR believes young readers view the world
(possible)
2. This is the way JKR wishes the world to be (unlikely)
3. This is the simplest and least contentious option - the line of
least resistance and most readers (most likely)
The idea that JKR is unaware of the gender role issue within the
text, or to suggest they were decided on unconciously can I think be
proved false by looking at a specific gender issues raised by JKR in
the texts.
For example, the point is made that no girls are chosen to play
Quidditch for Syltherin. Within the books the attitudes of the
Slytherins are often depicted as being unacceptable or "wrong" -
conservative, old fashioned even discriminatory (eg the pure
blood/mud blood debate). The association is that not giving girls an
equal presence on the team is equally "wrong".
There are however countless posts on this board (particulary from the
excellent judyserenity) about the lack of positive / strong female
characters. I think there seems to be some agreement that whether
intended or not - conciously or unconciously there is a gender
imbalance in the potterverse.
Perhaps this will be corrected with the revelations regarding Lily
over the next 3 books - perhaps not.
Perhaps we are expecting too much complexity/moral direction from
what is essentially a story simple enough to be enjoyed by readers of
all ages.
Imagine if groups such as this had been around when Blyton was
publishing childrens fiction. Now there is a gender imbalance.
Sirius
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive