Ethnicity in HP: A utopian depiction?
jchutney
jchutney at yahoo.com
Sun Jan 20 05:25:32 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 33770
I don't think JKR's depiction of race is utopian - I think it
is "realistic" considering the rest of the wizarding world. All of
the kids at Hogwarts are presumable British born (we know there are
wizarding schools all over the world). This leads one to believe
that even though Cho is ethnically Chinese, or the Patels are
ethnically Indian, that all the children at Hogwarts were born and
bred in the UK. So "culturally", these kids act "British". Fred and
Angelina undoubtedly have MUCH MUCH more in common than Fred and
Fleur.
We see a big difference between the British wizards and the non-Brits
(Viktor, Fleur, Karkaroff, etc). Fleur and the Beuxbatons are
presented in a condescending manner -- flighty and emotional --
surely the British version of the Continent. Viktor and his ilk seem
harsh at first, stereotypically Eastern European. Of course, once we
get to "know" Viktor, he turns out to be very nice indeed. In GoF
there's a reference to Ali Bashir who wants to import flying carpets
and Ludo Bagman says they'll never replace brooms. There's
definitely a tone of "our" broom are better than "their" carpets.
And at the World Cup, the Irish and the Bulgarian are fanatical about
their teams, etc.
It seems to me that the wizarding world's view on race and culture
is "realistic" given it's set-up. Since there are very few wizards
to begin with, why would they segrate based on race? Even though JKR
doesn't call "wizarding" a religion it effectively acts as one. In
this wizarding world, the most important things that would seperate
people (wizarding or muggle) are (1) their magical ability, (2)
their wizarding blood line (different wizards place differnt value on
this), (3) their "culture" and (4) their race. I'd go as far to say
that the other 3 things are so important to wizards that race becomes
a non-issue (which makes total sense).
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive