Moody was really Crouch, Jr.
meglet2
mercia at ireland.com
Fri Jan 25 15:52:56 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 34067
On the point of congruence between Moody and Crouch Jr. I accept
that Crouch Jr's general bahviour can't have been too far off Moddy's
persoanlity but I do think that there are several incidents that we
can see as more in keeping with Crouch than Moody (with the benefit
of hindsight of course!). During the bouncing ferret episode for
example I believe that Crouch was persecuting Draco quite
deliberately and just finding it convenient that he could also be
assumed to be sticking up for Harry. After all he tells Harry (more
than once) that there is nothing he hates more than a DE who got off.
Moody might well be expected to feel this but we know by the end
these are Crouch's real feelings. He asked Harry for details of how
LV might have tortured the DEs who didn't go to Azkaban and we know
that Lucius Malfoy was one of the first to go back to the MOM to save
their own skins. Crouch isn't the chap to let the son off for the
father's crimes. I reckon he would quite enjoy punishing the sins of
the fathers to the fourth and fitfth generation. Also in the curses
class, if we think about it, that is clearly done by someone with a
powerful sadistic streak. I do not believe Crouch when he says he
cleared it with Dumbledore (after all why should we believe anything
he says - his whole existence at this point is an elaborate lie) and
anyone who can torture animals (even spiders) with such relish can
torture human beings. It is perhaps the first indication that this is
not a good person if we only had eyes to see. His pretence of concern
for Neville at the end of the class may have been in keeping with
Moody (though he also had an alterior motive for it) but it is clear
from the text that seeing the effects of the cruciatis even on a
spider was a major trauma for Neville. I believe that would be a
bonus for Crouch who would again see a little persecution of the son
as an excellent way to get some revenge for the Longbottoms' work
against the Death Eaters. The real Alastor Moody is Dumbledore's
friend. He may be twitichy, unpredictable, unconcerned with other's
opinion's, suffering from persecution mania etc but I do not believe
that Dumbledore would be friend's with someone who was cruel in
nature. That of course is accepting that Dumbledore is the standard
for all that is good in the books and hoping hard that the
notorious 'gleam of triumph' is not a hint in the other direction.
But I think JKR said somewhere that Dumbledore is her idea of a good,
wise person so until proved otherwise by the books that is what I
will believe.
meglet2/mercia
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive