Future books: Humor element, Voldemort/Harry encounters & Non-Characters
cindysphynx
cindysphynx at home.com
Thu Jan 31 01:37:49 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 34358
Elkins wrote:
> Me, I found GoF by far the funniest of the
> books to date. The previous books, while they raised smiles in
> places and even a few "mental chuckles," never actually made me
> laugh out loud. GoF's the only one that's done that for me.
>
> But then, my sense of humor is *very* black (and also at times
> just plain weird), so I don't know how typical my own experience
> might be. Did anyone else out there find GoF the funniest of the
> four books? Or am I alone in this?
Oh, I'd agree that GoF was the funniest book by quite a bit. CoS
might also contend if you like Lockhart. PoA is my favorite book
overall, but I think that is because of the characterizations, not
the wit.
Elkins again:
> Some of the brands of humor that JKR favors have never amused me,
> frankly. I absolutely hate most varieties of "comeuppance" humor,
> for example -- I always have, ever since very early childhood --
and
> there's a *lot* of that in these books.
Hmmm. I'm not sure I follow you. "Comeuppance" humor, I'm guessing,
refers to things like Draco the Bouncing Ferret where we are supposed
to think it is funny when a character is abused? Are there other
examples you're thinking of?
As for my own taste in humor, I like zingers and one-liners, I
guess. I also like when characters are dreadfully and painfully
embarrassed, like the "Unexpected Task." I also like Sir Cadogan a
great deal, but I don't know what category his over-the-top dialogue
fits into.
I once went to a lecture on humor in college. I was so clueless that
I assumed the lecture would be, well, humorous. Instead, they talked
about what makes things humorous, which isn't nearly as
entertaining. :-) I don't remember much of what was said. So here's
the question: what are the types of humor? Does anyone know, and
are there examples of these categories in canon?
Elkins again (about future Voldemort vs Harry confrontations):
> They're already straining the leash, IMO. PoA is my favorite of
> the books, and I often suspect that part of the reason for that
> might be that it contains no direct confrontation with Voldie.
In my opinion, the pattern of the first four books is that the
Voldemort confrontations become more believable and suspenseful as we
move along. In other words, I liked the graveyard confrontation
better than the chamber confrontation better than the PS/SS
confrontation. Frankly, I don't see how JKR can top the graveyard
scene with anything other than the final confrontation. So I kind of
hope (and predict) we'll get conflict between members of Voldemort's
team and Dumbledore's team, but no Harry/Voldemort smackdown until
Book 7. I also figure our team will sustain some serious losses in
the next two books, but will manage a jaw-dropping comeback in Book 7.
Kimberly wrote:
> Mundungus Fletcher is far and away my favorite of the characters
> we've never actually met, or even of the lower echelon of
characters
> we have met.
It is funny that we can have favorite non-characters, isn't it? I
have very high hopes for Real Moody, Mrs. Lestrange and Mundungus,
but I'm a little nervous that I won't care for Dedalus Diggle. Toss
in Rookwood and Mulciber, and I don't see how OoP can miss.
Cindy (starting to sweat bullets because it is almost February and we
don't have an OoP release date)
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive