Re Potterverse: Social Psychology - Wizarding Genetics--Revisiting Genetics
tex23236
jbryson at richmond.infi.net
Tue Jul 2 14:12:35 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 40691
--- In HPforGrownups at y..., ksnidget at a... wrote:
> Alexander Lomski hypothesized, some time ago..
>
> >Genetic Theory
>
> >We make an initial assumption that magical talent is
> >controlled by some gene or set of genes. In other words, we
> >assume that wizards do have no differences from muggles but
> >in their genetic code.
>
> >So far, so good. What genes, then?
>
Could it be that magic is due to more than a single gene? I'm
thinking of something like IQ than seems to involve a whole bunch
of inherited talents, but seem to ride together? In fact, I wonder if
W might be associated with what we call IQ, although Goyle and
Crabe seem to offer counter-examples.
Tex,
also wondering how much W is a product of nurture.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive