Missing Weasley Children - Names

[barefootpuppets]

No: HPFGUIDX 40723


> Sorry, but everyone seems to forget that the naming scheme starts 
with A for
> Arthur.
> 
> Arthur
> Bill
> Charlie
> (gap filled with hypothetical dead son David)
> (Edward) Percy
> Fred
> George
> 
> ----Death of David---
> 
> Arthur and Molly rethinking naming scheme as bad luck
> followed by birth of
> 
> Ronald
> Ginny
> 
> Thus allowing for Ron to be a Seventh Son and there being veiled 
clues...<<

I've been following this thread with interest and only want to 
interject one thought:  What if there really wasn't a "David" and the 
alphabetical thing was just a coincidence?  OK.  This would make 
Ginny the 7th child.  Now, it's true that she wouldn't be a 7th SON, 
but JKR does tend to put twists and spins on some traditions.  Could 
it be that Ginny (who is supposed to, according to interviews, play a 
much larger role in future books), is the seer?

Now, jumping back to the Ron being a seer theory...I think this would 
be mighty hysterical if he and Hermione were to hook up...she is so 
anti-Divination, after all!

Just my two cents.

Heidi R.