What house was Peter Pettigrew in?
darrin_burnett
bard7696 at aol.com
Fri Jul 5 14:40:37 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 40808
--- In HPforGrownups at y..., "mrflynn6" <mrflynn6 at y...> wrote:
>
> > > > --
> >
> >
> >
> > The Lexicon tells us that it is almost a 99 percent certainty,
> based
> > on an interview with JKR, that James and Lily were Gryffindor.
> >
> > I further submit that the level of social interaction between the
> > Mauraders indicates they belong to the same house. They created a
> > rule-breaking map. They learned to be Animagus together. They
spent
> > countless hours together and that does not seem possible if they
> are
> > in separate houses, especially one with the animosity between
> > Gryffindor and Slytherin.
> >
> > Further, the timeline in the Lexicon says that Voldemort's rise
> began
> > in the early 1970s. James and Lily were at Hogwarts from 1971-
1978.
> > Most, if not all, of their school careers would have taken place
at
> a
> > time of fear and darkness.
> >
> > This would HARDLY be the time to be open and friendly to the
Death
> > Eaters residing over in Slytherin.
> >
> > I realize it is fun to look for shades of gray and there is a
> serious
> > culture of "Slytherins aren't so bad, just misunderstood" out
here,
> > but the Death Eaters were mostly descended from a Slytherin gang
> that
> > ran together at Hogwarts.
> >
> > The war with Voldemort has had some parallels drawn to World War
> II.
> > It's very simple. The Gryffindor were the resistance fighters and
> the
> > Slytherin were the sympathizers. Dumbledore was able to turn one
of
> > the sympathizers - Snape - to his cause.
> >
> > And as soon as the V-Man disappeared, the smarter sympathizers
like
> > Lucius Malfoy began proclaiming "It wasn't my fault. I was
> tricked,"
> > just like some of the sympathizers in France and other occupied
> > nations said after Hitler fell.
> >
> > I don't see future resistance fighters like James and Lily
> > fraternizing too much with the enemy.
> >
> > Darrin
> > -- Sometimes the search for gray is so intense that the black and
> > white right in front of you is lost.
>
>
Gretchen wrote:
> I have to beg to differ with you Darrin. Although the Lexicon
states
> that James is in Gryffindor, the interview does not. A reader
asked
> the question "What position did James play on the Gryffindor team"
> JKR stated simply that he was a chaser. She did not confirm nor
deny
> that he was in Gryffindor. She does state outright that Lily was
in
> Gryffindor.
>
> Gretchen
OK, I consider this hairsplitting. First, the Lexicon states with 99
percent certainty -- that's a quote from it -- that James was in
Gryffindor, so I suppose it takes into account the sliver of doubt
that could be raised by the interview.
Second, I consider a question -- What position did James play on the
Gryffindor team? -- to be clear.
It would be like asking the question, "What position did Michael
Jordan play on the Bulls?" and then saying that simply
answering "shooting guard" refuses to confirm that he DID play for
the Bulls.
Further, we have, in PoA, Lupin and Sirius referring to Snape as "a
greasy haired Slytherin" and in GoF as "running with a gang of
Slytherin who all became Death-Eaters.
If the Marauders were Slytherin, why in the world would they refer to
the House as belonging to someone else? It doesn't conclusively prove
they weren't Slytherin, but it certainly removes much of the
remaining doubts.
The Marauders started in 1971, about the same time as Voldemort rose
to power. By the time they graduated, a good portion of the
Slytherins, INCLUDING SNAPE, were on their way to becoming Death
Eaters. We saw what happened when Snape turned against Voldemort - he
is essentially a man targeted for death. Wouldn't any Slytherin who
stood up against the Death Eaters -- or perhaps even refused to be
considered DEs -- also have been put, at the very least, under a
cloud of suspicion?
So what you are saying is that the Marauders would have been
Slytherin, somehow turned against the DEs while still in school, and
then graduated safely at a time when the entire nation was in fear of
Voldermort? No, I think that is too far-fetched.
I concede there could be doubt as to whether all the Marauders were
Gryffindor, though I believe they were. But I believe there is loads
of evidence indicating that none of them were Slytherin. As for Ron's
statement about no bad wizard coming from anywhere but Slytherin, it
is either a bit of exaggeration, lack of knowledge -- he didn't know
about Sirius Black being bad until PoA -- or just another FLINT.
And again, I think the picture might be in broader strokes than
people want to admit.
The players on the sides of good and evil might be switched around
and twisted, but I don't think the books have ever contradicted the
overriding notion of clear good and clear evil.
Pettigrew chose a side. Maybe he was a tortured little man who
battled demons of insecurity, but in the end, he chose a side. Ditto
for Voldemort, Snape, and the Malfoys. On the other side, we have the
Potters, the HRH combo and Dumbledore.
Now, we may get surprises as to who is on what side, and we may get
switching of sides, but I don't think this blurring of good and evil
that I see here is accurate.
Darrin
-- Yes, good and evil does exist
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive