Official Philip Nel Question #10: Class
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Fri Jul 19 04:52:50 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 41413
Porphyria wrote:
> The way I see it, class is one of those fault lines along which
the
> HP series is inherently conflicted.
Elkins:
I see strong ambivalence here as well, and I agree with
Porphyria's implication that most of the internal contradictions of
the Harry Potter books cluster around the core concept of
*elitism* -
<snip>
Porphyria summarized Richard Adams' excellent article, "Harry
Potter and the Closet Conservative," with:
> Adams discusses how the HP series espouses a mix of both
> progressive and nostalgic ideas. Hogwarts is racially diverse
and coed, yet recreates the old-fashioned dream of conservative
Britain through its many allusions to the stereotypical British
public school, notions reinforced by the quaintly anachronistic
Wizarding culture at large.<<
I think Adams' analysis misses the point Rowling is making. The
class struggle depicted in the wizarding world is older than
liberals vs. tories. The WW is quasi-medieval and so is its class
war. Just as in the middle ages, we have a struggle between
class systems.
On one side is the old system of kinship based autonomous
groups where allegiances are cemented by the exchange of gifts
and services (think Beowulf), and on the other side is a
centralized system based on knowledge, governed by a
bureaucracy and cemented by a monetary system. In real life the
new system began to take shape with the rise of the cities
around the eleventh century--just when Hogwarts was founded.
The elite of the new system were the 'literati': those who could
read and write. The founding of Hogwarts represents a similar
revolution, transferring power from those who have inherited it to
those who have risen through competitive examinations.
Slytherin, who did not want the authority of all-magical families
destroyed, represents a subversive conservative element within
Hogwarts. He obviously saw the benefit of education, but wanted
it limited to the old ruling class.
In the wizarding world, as in medieval Europe, the new system
of trade is replacing the old economy based on personal
holdings. Mr. Borgin feigns to sympathize with the Malfoys,
complaining that wizard blood is counting for less and less
everywhere. However, as a shopkeeper, he benefits from the
new system, and lets his true sympathies show as soon as the
Malfoys leave, sneering at Malfoy and his manor.
Voldemort, Heir of Slytherin, is trying to re-establish the old
system: his followers are sworn personally to him, and are
rewarded in kind rather than in cash. His politics are those of
feud and vendetta. His preferred contest is the duel.
The relationship between the House Elves and their masters is
also part of the old system. House Elves owe allegiance to a
family and their term of service is ended by a gift. It is also
characteristic of the old system that justice is private and based
on a concept of personal injury. Mr. Crouch claims the right to
punish his Elf himself for defying his orders, instead of turning
her over to the Dept. for the Regulation and Control of Magical
Creatures which wishes to punish her for violating the code of
wand use, a victimless crime.
Looked at in this light, the contradiction Elkins perceives
resolves. The Dursleys and the overbearing Ministry of Magic
show us the downside of the revolution which Dumbledore is
trying to carry out. The system for which Dumbledore has such
hopes is vulnerable, not only to subversive reactionaries like
Slytherin and his descendant, but because, as Rowling shows
us, the educated are just as capable of injustice as the
bluebloods.
The Ministry is showing off its power by declaring any number of
victimless crimes, and it is attempting to keep its power for its
own by associating anyone who threatens it with the dread
powers of dark magic, just as the literati in the real life medieval
world manipulated fears of sorcery and devil worship to secure
their political power.
What Rowling seems nostalgic for is not the old ruling class per
se, but the virtue it once espoused: nobility of spirit, the desire to
protect the weak without exploitation. In the Potterverse, nobility
cannot be bought, nor bred (even the Weasleys throw off an
accountant now and then), nor even taught. It seems to be
conferred by grace on the humble.
Rowling's ideal seems to be a synthesis of the two systems,
ancient and modern. She would like to see the idealism of the
old chivalric system as represented by Gryffindor House
preserved as a shelter for those who need it, but combined with
the mobility and meritocracy of the new.
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive