Secret Agent Snape
atonement24
atonement24 at yahoo.co.uk
Sat Jul 27 10:56:25 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 41795
Grace writes:
> What would [Snape] have offered [Voldemort]? Being the Potions
> Master, I think what he offered was a new potion that he invented
> that can "put a stopper on death." With that kind of offering Snape
> has also put a stopper on his own death.
But probably only by a few months. Voldemort is not foolish enough
to trust Snape again if he's been betrayed in the past. *If* he
knows that Snape was once a traitor, then Snape's as good as dead
already. He would have to offer Voldemort something big, something
that no other Death Eater can (perhaps, as Grace says a "stopper on
death") to not be AK'd on the spot. It would have to intrigue
Voldemort enough to put off killing Snape until it's been conducted --
but you can be rest assured that as soon as Snape has fulfilled his
purpose, he'll be killed. Even if he was a genuine a Death Eater
this time round, he betrayed Voldemort in the past, and that kind of
behaviour is unlikely to be rewarded by the Dark Lord himself, just
because Snape's been useful this time round.
Unless ... before Snape was a double agent for Dumbledore, he was a
double agent for Voldemort? He might have pretended to be on the
good side to begin with, using their own information against them by
allowing Voldemort access to it all, and passing back false
information about the Death Eater and such to Dumbledore, as
instructed by Voldemort. Then, after having an attack of
conscience, Snape told Dumbledore everything. After that, the
information he passed on to the Death Eaters would have been pre-
prepared and falsified, and Voldemort would be unaware of
everything.
So, in this version of events, when Snape returns to Voldemort to
pledge his allegiance, Voldemort will have no intention of killing
him, because he *doesn't know* that Snape betrayed him in the first
place. It was always part of Snape's job to fool Dumbledore into
believing he was betraying Voldemort, and -- from Voldemort's POV --
that was exactly what Snape has done. It would be near impossible
for Voldemort to discover that Snape *truly* betrayed him, because
the illusion worked so well at hiding the truth. That's why, I
think, only under these circumstances could lead to Snape being
accepted back into Voldemort's fold with welcoming arms. I'm sure
that Snape is even more valuable now, because he's closer to
Dumbledore than ever. Voldemort could use a contact like that.
Of course, it's possible that Snape truly is on Voldemort's side, and
that it is Dumbledore himself that's been fooled by Snape's double-
crossing, but I sincerely hope that's not the case. I guess only
time (and more Harry Potter books) will tell whether Snape is good or
evil, and I have a feeling that it'll be a bit of both.
Sara writes:
> I had been wondering if [Snape] could do a deal with Lucius Malfoy,
> seeing how Snape has looked after Draco so well in his time at
> Hogwarts, maybe he could get him to vouch for him or something. But
> I doubt it.
That reminds me of a line I came across at the end of 'The Goblet of
Fire', when Harry is trying to prove to Fudge that Voldemort has
truly been restored to power...
" 'I saw the Death Eaters! I can give you names! Lucius Malfoy --'
Snape made a sudden movement, but as Harry looked at him, Snape's
eyes flew back to Fudge."
(GoF, UK paperback, children's version, page 613)
It's a very subtle moment, but JKR indicates that this is important.
Why did Snape react so 'suddenly' to the name of Lucius Malfoy? He
cannot be surprised that Malfoy is a Death Eater, surely? Perhaps
then, it is something more personal, but you'd imagine that Snape has
seen Lucius plenty of times since Draco started school -- for
parent/teacher meetings and whatnot? Something must have happened,
though, that is for sure.
Adia
X
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive