1980 being Harry Potter's Birthyear (short)
usergoogol
usergoogol at yahoo.com
Thu Jun 6 22:04:51 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 39511
---ORIGINALLY SAID BY SHERLOCK AKA MERLIN---
On the 1980 being Harry's birth year, I was wondering something. It
would make more sense that JK Rowling is writing the books so that
they happen in real time, rather than events that have already
happened - or it would make more sense for the age group HP is aimed
at (9yr olds), just to make the books and the world of Harry Potter
seem more 'real' to them. I wonder if it is possible that the
working out of the date from Nearly Headless Nick's cake in CoS is
just a blooper? 500 just being a handy number or something (or a
more significant number to celebrate - after all, I think odd
numbers have some magical significance...). Plus 1492 is supposed to
be the year Christopher Columbus discovered America (which is a date
most people know).
---------------------------------------------
I disagree with some of your reasoning, (Harry Potter is not
targetted at nine year olds) but I agree with you to an extent.
Besides the fact that 1492 and 500 are both very nice round numbers,
there is a bit of a factual error which, although can be gotten
around by saying that Rowling just made a little mistake, does
impare the thing a bit.
In the begining of GoF, (supposedly in 1994) Dudley's Playstation is
thrown out the window. However, the Sony Playstation was first
released in 1995. (And England tends to get video games later than
the rest of the world, not earlier.) Trust me on this, by the way, I
know my video games.
I don't, however, think that the 1980 chronology is completely
wrong. After all, 1994 and 1995 are pretty close. I think that the
whole matter is very delicate though, and that there is no purely
failsafe timeline theory. (This one is ideal for the time being
though.)
~User "Harry Potter and the Ocarina of Time" Googol~
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive