Muggle products, levitation, and werewolf cures
N Fry
nmfry at hotmail.com
Sat Jun 8 23:10:34 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 39604
Just my reactions to some of the various topics brought up lately...
Marcus wrote:
>Another might be that small, self-contained, battery-operated muggle
>devices work. Things like flashlights (torches for the UK), watches,
>*normal cameras*, that sort of thing.
(my emphasis on cameras, not Marcus's)
In PoA, Colin Creevy uses a camera. When he approaches Harry for the first
time he "was clutching what looked like an ordinary Muggle camera..." (Ch 6,
pg 96, US hardcover). It isn't a wizard camera, because he expresses his
amazement at the fact that one of the boys in his dorm said that the
pictures would move if he developed them in a special potion. Later, in Ch 7
(pg 109) when Colin is taking pictures of Quidditch practice, his camera is
only described as making a clicking noise (nothing else special about it).
Meanwhile, in GoF (Ch 18, pg 302) the photographer from the Daily Prophet
has "a large black camera that was smoking slightly." I can't find the page
reference now, but I seem to remember the wizard camera later being
described as making a popping noise and giving off puffs of colored smoke
when pictures are taken. I may be wrong about that, though...
Steve of the Lexicon wrote:
>They can't fly, true, but they can Levitate. Wingardium Leviosa is
>taught to First Years, and there are undoubtedly even more complicated and
>wondrous variations of this magic which accomplished witches and wizards
>can perform.
_Quidditch_Through_the_Ages_ supports this in the chapter about the
evolution of the flying broomstick (pg 1): "No spell yet devised enables
wizards to fly unaided in human form. <snip details about Animagi turning
into flying creatures> Levitation is commonplace, but our ancestors were not
content with hovering five feet above the ground." Witches/wizards who were
hung during the witch trials could have simply pretended to die as they
hovered at the end of the noose.
carrie-Ann wrote:
>All this talk about Lupin has me wondering... Lockhart says that he did a
>spell on a werewolf that turned him back into a man, and he no longer
>transformed. I know that Lockhart himself didn't do it, but he says that
>all othe things he claims to have done were actually accomplished, just by
>other people. Does this mean that there is a cure for Lupin?
This reminds me of something I've been thinking about. In PoA, Lupin tells
the trio, "I was a small boy when I recieved the bite. My parents tried
everything, but *in those days there was no cure*" (ch 18, pgs 352-3). Does
he mean that there is a cure now? In the next sentence, he comments that the
Wolfsbane Potion is a very recent discovery. I don't think he's referring to
it when he says "cure," but the wording seems a bit confusing to me. Maybe
Wolfsbane can prevent people from becoming werewolves if used soon enough
after the bite, but can't cure them if they are already werewolves (although
it does make them safer by helping them keep their rational minds...)
~ Nik (who finds herself paying *a lot* more attention to picky little
details while rereadings the books, thanks to all the posts she's been
reading since joining this group)
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive