Time-Turner

archeaologee JPA30 at cam.ac.uk
Mon Jun 17 00:55:27 UTC 2002


No: HPFGUIDX 39941

> --- In HPforGrownups at y..., "grey_wolf_c" <greywolf1 at j...> wrote:
> 
> > I'm just brainstorming here, so don't be afraid to point out 
> > inconsistencies, but the reason could be that there is a limit to 
> the  number of times you can use the TT to re-live a particular 
> time (let's say two), and thus the last one, instead of being used 
> by Hermione to  attend Charms, was used for a nice one-hour 
> nap in the common room. It  fits canon, but I cannot think of any 
> reason why you could use it two times 
> 
Sorry to rain on any parades, but there is an off cannon reason for 
Hermione not to be able to attend that class which is pretty 
infallible.

She in informed by Ron and Harry she missed charms.  She uses the 
time turner to go back and attend that class.  So why would Ron and 
Harry tell her she missed it.  They wouldn't, because she wouldn't 
have missed it.

When travelling back in time the one thing you absolutely CANNOT do 
is invalidate your reason for going back in time in the first place.  
Logically impossible (if I remember my philosophy of science right).  
You must leave things so that when time runs again (or whichever 
model one uses for time travel) when you reach the point after you 
have changed things you still decide to go back in time.

James (who has been itching to use philosophy of science in this 
debate and is grateful for the opportunity)





More information about the HPforGrownups archive