Time-Turner
archeaologee
JPA30 at cam.ac.uk
Mon Jun 17 00:55:27 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 39941
> --- In HPforGrownups at y..., "grey_wolf_c" <greywolf1 at j...> wrote:
>
> > I'm just brainstorming here, so don't be afraid to point out
> > inconsistencies, but the reason could be that there is a limit to
> the number of times you can use the TT to re-live a particular
> time (let's say two), and thus the last one, instead of being used
> by Hermione to attend Charms, was used for a nice one-hour
> nap in the common room. It fits canon, but I cannot think of any
> reason why you could use it two times
>
Sorry to rain on any parades, but there is an off cannon reason for
Hermione not to be able to attend that class which is pretty
infallible.
She in informed by Ron and Harry she missed charms. She uses the
time turner to go back and attend that class. So why would Ron and
Harry tell her she missed it. They wouldn't, because she wouldn't
have missed it.
When travelling back in time the one thing you absolutely CANNOT do
is invalidate your reason for going back in time in the first place.
Logically impossible (if I remember my philosophy of science right).
You must leave things so that when time runs again (or whichever
model one uses for time travel) when you reach the point after you
have changed things you still decide to go back in time.
James (who has been itching to use philosophy of science in this
debate and is grateful for the opportunity)
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive