Twins/Percy/Ron/Molly
moongirlk
moongirlk at yahoo.com
Wed Mar 6 15:53:06 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 36096
--- In HPforGrownups at y..., "lucky_kari" <lucky_kari at y...> wrote:
> --- In HPforGrownups at y..., "finwitch" <finwitch at y...> wrote:
> The twins target on Percy
> because
> > he hasn't reacted yet (except by telling them off) - they want to
> see
> > if Percy has emotions.
>
> I can't buy this. Because Percy does react. He chases them around
and
> goes into rages throughout the books. He doesn't answer back with a
> poker face. Instead, he is always described as turning a deep red.
> They definitely know he has emotions. The reason they continue
their
> tricks against him is that they DO get such a good reaction.
>
I keep thinking it's actually secret option #3 - they are hoping to
jiggle some emotional variety out of him. Eileen is right, he does
fly into rages a bit more often than any of the other good guys, bar
Snape. I kinda think initially just wanted to lighten him up so he
wouldn't take everything so seriously. After awhile I think it just
became a habit, and I kind of see what Elkins is saying about it
having become more of an antagonistic (I wouldn't go so far as to say
malicious, because I can't see any actual harm in any of the pranks)
thing, since now it seems like they actually enjoy getting a rise out
of him. But I think they'd be thrilled if one day he shot back a
clever one-liner or set them up with some great joke instead of just
being red-faced and angry all the time.
Oh - while I'm at it... why do people see the canary cream thing with
Neville as mean? I am very protective of Neville, he's one of my
most beloved characters and I hate that the trio leaves him out all
the time and when McG was so mean to him about the passwords I wanted
to shake her. When I read the bit about the canary cream, I though
it was great because while Hermione treats Neville with great
kindness, it also seems rather condescending to me. To me the canary
cream thing wasn't Fred and George singling out a "weak" person to
pick on. I think at best it was them not differentiating
between "poor weak Neville" and everyone else who *would* be a target
of their jokes, and at worst it was them putting out canary creams
and Neville being the one to pick one up, meaning that they had no
particular target in mind. What's more, the incident showed Neville
in a very good light, as I see it. We see that Neville is a good
sport who's comfortable enough with himself despite his insecurities
that he can appreciate a good joke, even if the joke is him.
So those of you who consider it to be mean, why is that? Did it seem
like ridicule to you?
kimberly
still determined to like the twins
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive