Animagus Transformation & Naked Wizards (WAS Sartorial blind-spots, )
cindysphynx
magicalme at comcast.net
Sun Mar 10 21:12:53 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 36299
Elkins wrote:
>You know, I have to admit that it never once occurred to me to
> wonder what Pettigrew was wearing in Shrieking Shack. <snip
cringing>
Not to worry. There's plenty of evidence that Animagi keep their
clothes. ::pauses to imagine McGonagall in her birthday suit on the
wall on Privet Drive and in the classroom in PoA:: Well, if there
isn't evidence, we need to find it *right now*.
I think Peter dropped a spare set of robes, because he knew that his
own robes would go with him when he transformed. Yes, that's it.
I actually think JKR's handling of animagi transformation makes some
sense. The wizard keeps everything personal to the wizard (glasses,
robes). The wizard keeps all magical items, also. This is how Lupin
still has the invisibility cloak when he becomes a wolf (yes, I know
that's not an animagus transformation) and how McGonagall keeps her
wand.
So where is Pettigrew's wand? It should have transformed with him,
but he appears not to have it. That's, uh, because he set his wand
on self-destruct, see. He didn't just blow a hole in the street with
his wand. He's a weak, talentless thing, right Sirius? Pettigrew
had his wand blow *itself* up. He yells out, then he drops the wand,
transforms, scurries, and then the wand explodes before the muggles
know what hit them. Now *that* would generate some seriously lethal
magical energy. So they never found Pettigrew's wand because it no
longer exists.
Cindy (not eager to imagine Rita Skeeter in the altogether, either)
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive