[HPforGrownups] Digest Number 1729

[midgiecat at aol.com]

No: HPFGUIDX 36354

Re:  "naamagatus" <naama_gat at hotmail.com>
Subject:  Animagus Transformation & Naked Wizards (WAS Sartorial blind-spots, 
)

> In HPforGrownups at y..., "cindysphynx" <magicalme at c...> wrote:
> Elkins wrote:
> 
> >You know, I have to admit that it never once occurred to me to 
> > wonder what Pettigrew was wearing in Shrieking Shack.  <snip 
> cringing> 
 
    snip
 
> So where is Pettigrew's wand?  It should have transformed with him, 
> but he appears not to have it.  snip
  
> Pettigrew had his wand blow *itself* up.  He yells out, then he drops the 
wand, 
> transforms, scurries, and then the wand explodes before the muggles 
> know what hit them.  Now *that* would generate some seriously lethal 
> magical energy.  So they never found Pettigrew's wand because it no 
> longer exists.  

snip

I agree with the wand getting blown up with Peter.  Otherwise, anytime a 
wizard was blown up, wouldn't their wands be found??  Such as in the case of 
Lily and James.  After their "blowup" wouldn't their wands be found at the 
scene and taken?  The only thing removed from that scene was baby Harry. 

Brenda W. an avid reader of fanfic. 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]