[HPforGrownups] Good & Evil/ Dark Mark
Betty
landers at email.unc.edu
Thu Mar 21 16:16:51 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 36800
snip
Anna? wrote:
> Now compare that to Voldemort-Era Bartemius Crouch, Sr.
> He's so sure that he's in the right that he forgets
> what's wrong. And that leads to such intemperate
> decisions as giving Aurors free license to kill and
> prosecuting his own son without a second thought.
> Crouch's philosophy is that if you are right, nothing is
> wrong. But as with Voldemort, I think we're led to
> believe that this way of thinking is, well, wrong.
To me, Crouch was right to prosecute his son. Clearly Crouch had some
evidence that his son *was* a Death Eater. I don't think he would have
prosecuted him without a reason. The biggest mistake, I think, was
releasing him from Azkaban. This move ended up getting him killed, and
it ended up helping bring back Voldemort. Voldy would have had a hard
time getting to Harry without Crouch.
Betty, wondering if this post made any sense.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive