[HPforGrownups] Good & Evil/ Dark Mark

Betty landers at email.unc.edu
Thu Mar 21 16:16:51 UTC 2002


No: HPFGUIDX 36800

snip
Anna? wrote:
> Now compare that to Voldemort-Era Bartemius Crouch, Sr.
> He's so sure that he's in the right that he forgets
> what's wrong. And that leads to such intemperate
> decisions as giving Aurors free license to kill and
> prosecuting his own son without a second thought.
> Crouch's philosophy is that if you are right, nothing is
> wrong. But as with Voldemort, I think we're led to
> believe that this way of thinking is, well, wrong.

To me, Crouch was right to prosecute his son.  Clearly Crouch had some
evidence that his  son *was* a Death Eater.  I don't think he would have
prosecuted him without a reason.  The biggest mistake, I think, was
releasing him from Azkaban.  This move ended up getting him killed, and
it ended up helping bring back Voldemort.  Voldy would have had a hard
time getting to Harry without Crouch.

Betty, wondering if this post made any sense.




More information about the HPforGrownups archive