Dragons / Trelawney / Memory Charm / Snape / Crouch / Longbottom
catlady_de_los_angeles
catlady at wicca.net
Thu Mar 21 20:45:36 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 36814
finwitch wrote:
> Does one need to kill a dragon in order to get it's heart-string
> for a wand, BTW?
I think so. And I think dragons must be killed to get their hides for
all those dragon-hide gloves and boots we see in canon, and the
dragon liver at the Diagon Alley apothecary during Harry's first
shopping trip. In the Potterverse, they're just animals. Big,
dangerous animals.
Tabouli wrote:
> I've always imagined [Trelawney] as late forties or so, old enough
> to have a face written with lines of mystic wisdom, but young
> enough to retain a mass of untidy dark curls,
IE, the same age as McGonagall in the books, whose hair is still
black. "Her black hair was drawn into a tight bun" when Harry was
left on the Dursley doorstep. "A tall, black-haired witch in
emerald-green robes stood there" at the beginning of Sorting Hat
chapter. JKR's illo:
http://photos.groups.yahoo.com/group/hpforgrownups/vwp?.dir=/Harry+Pot
ter+%26+Me&.src=gr&.dnm=dursleysdoorstep.jpg&.view=t&.done=http%3a//ph
otos.groups.yahoo.com/group/hpforgrownups/lst%3f%26.dir=/Harry%2bPotte
r%2b%2526%2bMe%26.src=gr%26.view=t
Personally, I envisioned Trelawney with gray hair...
> You know, despite the ever-proliferating flotillas roaming Theory
> Bay, I have yet to witness a ship which rustles up some romance
> for the slender, sultry Sibyll.
I don't think she ever had a romance, but I do think she's
heterosexual and desperate. I think she's pursuing Lupin in PoA: when
she came to Christmas Dinner, almost the first thing she said was,
"But where is dear Professor Lupin?" and I said "She only came in
search of him". Then she said: "He positively fled when I offered to
crystal gaze for him --" and I said: "He fled because he perceived
that she was just seeking an excuse to get him alone and grope him."
> [Memory Charms] Have an effect which wears off within a few hours
> at most (hence Mr Roberts needed to be re-Charmed several times
> each day)
I think not: the Muggles, and Lockhart's victims, don't need to be
re-Charmed. I had immediately assumed that Mr Roberts needed to be
Charmed (not re-Charmed) several times each day because he needed to
be Charmed for EACH incident in which careless wizards made him
suspicious.
It just now occurred to me that it would have been more practical for
the MoM co-ordinators to have knocked the Robertses unconscious for
the duration of the event & run the campground Themselves -- okay,
I'm not sure how they would give them a false memory to explain the
lost weekend, so send the Robertses on an all-expenses-paid,
magically-winning weekend in Las Vegas & run the campground
Themselves, cleaning it up afterwards so that the Roberts don't know
that there were Tons of Trepassers.
Eloise wrote:
> My original speculation (going back to my musings about his
> childhood in my last post) was that [Snape] was seeking a
> father-figure in the big D, his own having let him down by never
> showing him any approval.
Agreed. In addition, there have been theories of Snape joining the
Death Eaters out of anger at Dumbledore siding with the Marauders or
out of despair at losing a girlfriend to a Gryffindor, but I think he
was led into Death Eating by his quest for approval from people who
just happened to be DEs, if not actually having fastened on a DE as
his attempted father-figure. I imagine Severus's parents as having
shown him very little attention at all, almost as little disapproval
as approval. They just found him and his entire existence a total
bore. Therefore, the primary school serves as the source of
spontaneous vicious cruelty directed at him, thus explaining the
sarcasm and vengefulness and uncontrollably strong emotions.
Marina Rusalka wrote:
> I hope I don't alienate myself from the other Snapefans too much
> with this theory, but I have this strong suspicion that the
> 16-year-old Severus did not acquit himself at all well when faced
> with a snarling werewolf in a narrow tunnel. He was not Tough. He
> screamed like a girl and went wobbly in the knees and forgot all
> those vaunted Dark Hexes he's been so famous for since he was
> eleven. In short, he panicked, and to make it worse, he was *seen*
> panicking --
In my own view of the Potterverse, 16-year-old Severus feels as
humiliated and as resentful of the humiliation as in your theory, but
all he did to be ashamed of was that he (finally!) ran away, leaving
Potter behind him, between him and the onrushing werewolf (which is
what Potter had urgently been ordering him to do and he kept refusing
until the monster was actually approaching). Upon exiting the
Whomping Willow, he *suddenly realises* that *he* Ran Away, leaving
Potter as diversion for the monster, while *Potter* has died at the
teeth of a werewolf to save him!
The knowledge that Potter will be viewed as a hero and memorialized
at Hogwarts while he is considered a coward bites at him much more
urgently than any later thought of life-debt, and causes him to run
for help (!) to his Head of House or Headmaster. When he discovers
that Potter was Perfectly Safe as an Animagus (note: not Perfectly
Safe, considering the werewolf/Padfoot fight in PoA), he is totally
convinced that Potter and Black set this up On Purpose to make him
run away like a coward. He could believe that Lupin was in on That
Plan, as in it, Lupin was not in any danger of biting him (and being
sent to Azkaban, or whatever the punishment is for a werewolf who
bites a wizard).
Betty wrote:
> To me, Crouch was right to prosecute his son. (snip). The biggest
> mistake, I think, was releasing him from Azkaban.
Yes, I think this is a trick that JKR played on us. Sirius and the
Pensieve told us things that made us think Jr was an innocent boy
railroaded by Sr, that Sr was cruel to imprison his own son, that
Sr's strict merciless adherence to the rule of Law was itself an
Error... but Jr WAS guilty, Sr WAS right to imprison him, Sr's Error
was his merciful violation of Law i.e. helping Jr escape from Azkaban.
Eileen Lucky Kari wrote:
> more likely to emphasize that it is up to Nevillus to wipe out
> this blot on the honour of the Lombotommi
Agreed with essay, <snicker>ed at Romanization, noticed that
Lombotommi looked at first like Lobotomi...
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive