TimeTurner!Snape/ Future loyalties
jodel at aol.com
jodel at aol.com
Sat Nov 23 00:07:48 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 46997
Judy Serenity writes;
>>But, I don't really see a reason for Snape to time-travel back to the
Graveyard scene. Being at the Graveyard really buys him (and the"Light" side)
nothing.<<
Not even if he feeds Voldemort some supposedly "classified" information on
Dumbledore's present projects? Not even though his being at the graveyard
*after* Harry gets away will give them some information on what Voldemort's
next actions are likely to be (What instructions has he given his followers
regarding what he wants them working on before their next meeting?)
I think that Snape and Dumbledore have already determined that it will be
easier for Snape to mend his bridges than to insert a brand new spy into
Voldemort's ranks.
As to Dumbeldore's "outing" Snape's prior role as a spy. We still do not know
when Snape went to work at Hogwarts. It is not yet clear whether or not
Voldemort inserted Snape into Dumbledore's school "as" a spy in the first
place. (The school, mind you, not the Order.) If that is the case, Snape was
covered whichever side might have won, and we still don't know whose side he
is REALLY on. The fact that he has had Lucius Malfoy's continued support
suggests that either Voldemort DID insert him as his own spy, and Lucius was
high enough up to know it, or Snape managed to sell the "double agent" story
to the other ex-DEs of his aquaintance rather more convincingly than Lucius
managed to convince the WW as a whole of his "Imperius Defence". If the
latter is the case, then sooner or later Voldemort is going to find out and
there will be some hard questions asked, but the other DEs aren't likely to
rat him out over it. (Speaking of which, Pettigrew was already with the
Weasleys by the time of Snape's trial, and I don't know how much about it he
ever heard, if anything. This could be one of the bits of information which
got past him.)
Whose side Snape is REALLY on I *really* think is going to be the $64.000
question for the last three books of the series.
Over the first four books, the question was; whose side is Snape on?
Acording to the conclusion of book four the answer is pretty conclusively
"Dumbledore's".
I don't see Rowling leaving it at that.
The bar has been raised. Now the question has become; whose side is he REALLY
on? I think that in this case there is a very good chance that we are going
to be told (and pretty quickly, too, probably in book 5) that Voldemort DID
send him to spy within the school. And that in the three remaining books he
will continue to take actions which are going to call the matter of his
loyalties into question all over again. And keep us guessing.
Which is why I think that the possibility of Voldemort setting Snape a "test"
of his loyalties is probably dead on.
And I agree with Pip that the test of Snape bringing him Dumbledore's head on
a platter is one very strong possibility. (I remember posting something very
like it on the AOL board (IIRC) a year or so ago.) And, what's more, I can
see Dumbledore agreeing to it. Particularly if there is a chance of buying
his side some major magical protective advantage by his willing sacrifice. (I
can easily see Dumbledore choosing to trump Voldy's ace by playing the
Obi-Wan card.) If this is the case, I think it is more likely to be in book
five than in book six. But this is only one possibility, and Rowling may very
well not choose to go there at all.
But I DO think she wants to keep us guessing over Snape's real alliegances. I
do NOT think that she is going to sit back and let us comfortably start
taking him for granted as one of the good guys.
As to Snape's blocking QuirrelMort; That's not really such a big deal.
Quirrel was stated more than once as being *young*. Younger than Snape. Snape
and his contemporaries were the *new* kids when Voldemort fell. Quirrel was
too young to have EVER been one of Voldy's followers, and (I suspect) didn't
come from a family which had ever supported him. Unless Voldemort identified
himself, there was NO REASON for Snape to neeed to admit to supposing that
Quirrell wanted the Stone for anyone but himself. He could probably spin a
perfectly plausible tale that he was saving the stone *for* Voldemort -- and
polishing his credentials with Dumbledore at the same time. After all, he
doesn't have to admit that he knew Dumbledore was intending to destroy the
stone after using it for bait, either. And does he need to volunteer that
Dumbledore expected *Voldemort* to make a grab for the Stone, or just that he
expected *somebody* to? Snape's an experienced spy. He doesn't tell
*everything* he knows.
-JOdel
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive