TBAY: Disproving MD, what Quirrellmort knew
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Mon Nov 25 01:09:00 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 47099
Abigail stares at the smoking gauntlet which Melody has tossed
in front of her.
>>"If, in fact, we find out in future books that Dumbledore has not
beenscheming and planning and it is proven that he in fact has
not helped bring about the rebodiment of Voldemort, then MD is
disproven and there would be a big party thrown by Marina at the
tavern I assureyou. MD's hands are completely tied to the fact
that Dumbledore is a general of war and that he has made
aggressive strategic plans to end the war. Did that answer your
question?" <<
"Don't move, Abigail," says Pippin. Abigail blinks. Did Pippin
appear out of nowhere? Or had she only been having a few
words with Grey Wolf over in the corner?
"I'll take care of it."
Pippin eyes Bluesqueak and Melody, about to sip from her glass
of mysterious ruby red liquid. But for some reason it seems to
have clotted.
"George!' she calls. "Make me a fresh one, will you?"
"Right-o, Sangria, is it?"
"That's right, love. Put it on my tab." Pippin turns her attention
back to Melody and Bluesqueak.
"So, you say that to disprove Dishwasher, we must disprove the
arbitrary negative assertion that the books don't prove that
Dumbledore didn't help bring about Voldemort's return?
Fascinating!
"But nobody *can* do that, you know. Not even JK Rowling.
Abitrary negatives cannot be disproved. If I say, 'The cat's not in
the bathtub', you can't disprove it without looking in the bathtub.
At which point the statement is no longer arbitrary."
Pipsqueak shrugs. "The assertions of Magic Dishwasher are not
arbitrary, they are based on knowledge. As Melody says,
Dumbledore is a general of war. We can make certain
assertions based on our knowledge of generals, spies, and
Dumbledore's capabilities."
"Sorry, but proving that Dumbledore *could* have done
something doesn't mean you've proved that he *did.* If you want
us to accept your assertions, you're going to have to assume the
burden of proof. And once you get past the obvious, that
Dumbledore had spies and so did Voldemort, there's very little
specific evidence and an awful lot of generalizing. And going on
your, er, general knowledge of generals is pretty shaky, because
Dumbledore's hardly a typical case."
" Real World generals and spymasters behave the way they do
because they are appointed to their positions by people like
Fudge. If they start developing inconvenient moral reservations
then they are removed from office. Fudge is threatening to do just
that, if you remember. But we've seen that the threat is hollow.
Nothing Fudge can do is going to displace Dumbledore as far
as the Old Crowd is concerned.
"So Dumbledore is at liberty to reject the quasi-Utilitarian ethic
which Grey Wolf ascribes to him, no matter how popular it is
among politicians, bureaucrats and their employees.
"Utilitarianism? I don't recall Grey Wolf using that term," says
Pipsqueak.
"Well, Utilitarianism is an ethical theory which says that all action
should be directed toward achieving the greatest happiness for
the greatest number of people. We can make a pretty good
argument that Dumbledore is not a Utilitarian, by the way. He
teaches Harry that in many cases what would make people
happiest would actually be bad for them. However, Grey Wolf
seems to be saying that what Dumbledore seeks is to bring
about the greatest *good* for the greatest number. As an ethical
theory, that's tautological. We can't tell whether an action is good
or bad by weighing it against the theory, because the theory
doesn't tell us what goodness is.
"But Dishwasher!Dumbledore's actions are moral," says
Pip!Squeak, "because they are directed at the Downfall of
Voldemort."
"Oh well," says Pippin, "If you want to be relatavistic--"
>>>""I think it's always been our detractors who regard
Dishwasher!Dumbledore as morally relativist, actually," says the
Pipsqueak, "I think that to be making pragmatic decisions, hard
choices, assessments that these particular means are justified
by this particular end, Dumbledore would need a very solid
moral core indeed."<<<
"But that's relativism in a nutshell," says Pippin. " 'Relatavism: a
theory that conceptions of truth and moral values are not
absolute but are relative to the persons or groups holding them.'
Dishwasher!Dumbledore has allowed or arranged Voldemort's
return, which is hardly an absolute good, but is good only
because Dumbledore, judging by the standards of his society,
thinks it would be. Pettigrew did the same thing, but because he
had no social good in mind, it was evil. "
"And you know, I think you are going to have to choose between
Spy!Snape and Dishwasher!Snape. Because if Dishwasher
holds, then Voldmort has lots of other faithful DE's, whom he can
insert into Hogwarts as easily as he did young Barty. If Snape
shows up, Dishwasher!Voldemort won't need to send him back
to Hogwarts to spy on Dumbledore. Especially not if Snape
brought Dumbledore' s head with him. He might see fit to keep
Snape around for some other reason, to work on potions or
because," Pippin pauses here and looks significantly at Wendy,
"Snape gives good hem.
"But Snape the Spy is toast. Surplus to requirements. Kill the
spare!"
"But even if you don't believe in Dishwasher! Dumbledore, Snape
the spy is toast." says another voice. Barb, suprised to find her
self a in a TBAY scenario, looks around in wonder (post 46968)
>> we mustn't forget that Voldemort was possessing Quirrell's
body during Harry's first year, and Snape and Quirrell had
numerous run-ins. Voldemort knew, whenhe was in Quirrell's
body, that Snape was on Dumbledore's side and trying to
prevent Quirrell from getting the stone. He was there for every
encounter between the two professors, and he was aware (as
Quirrell was) that Snape was using a counter-jinx to save Harry
during the Quidditch match."<<
"Ah," says Pippin, but *Quirrell* never told Snape that he was
serving Voldemort."
"Ignorance is a lame excuse," snaps Barb. "I can't see Voldemort
falling for it."
"Oh, Snape has a much better excuse than that. He doesn't need
to say that he thought Quirrell was trying to get the Stone for
himself. I see it this way --
A cloudy haze appears in the middle of the room, and everyone
scoots out of the way as the semi-transparent figures of Severus
Snape and Lord Voldemort appear in the center of it. Snape
grovels at Voldemort's feet:
'My Lord, had you but revealed yourself to me, had I but known, I
would have done all that I could to aid you. --"
'I lose patience, Severus. Surely you didn't believe that a young,
inexperienced wizard like Quirrell could have broken into
Gringotts or hexed a Nimbus 2000 all by himself."
"Of course not, my Lord. Only a very powerful wizard could have
done such things. Only you--and one other. He has set tests for
me before. "
Voldemort manages to look skeptical, though this is difficult
without eyebrows. "You thought *Dumbledore* would turn a troll
loose. In his own school?"
"But no one was harmed, my Lord. Not even the Mudblood girl.
Far easier to believe that the beast was charmed than that three
first-years could defeat a wild Mountain Troll without so much as
a scratch. It did occur to me that the giant canine guarding the
Stone was also a sham, but--" Snape glances down at his leg, "it
turned out to be a somewhat more formidable foe. My Lord, I beg
you to believe me. If I could have but penetrated the Stone's
defences, I would have brought it to you myself, whatever the
danger. But alas! it was held within a Mirror and as you know--"
"Quite, Severus. A little joke of Dumbledore's, that. Very amusing.
Still, that does not explain your eagerness to defend Harry
Potter."
"But my Lord, if it was a test...I couldn't very well let Dumbledore
think I was prepared to let Potter die, now could I? "
"You think Dumbledore would risk precious Potter's life and
subject him to Dark Magic simply to prove your loyalty?"
"Quirrell used Dark Magic on a broom, not on Potter himself. And
if it were but a test...I need hardly tell you that a fall from a
broomstick wouldn't ordinarily be fatal. Not to one of us. It
wouldn't be enough to kill Longbottom, much less Potter
himself."
"I had no choice, my Lord, but to do as I did. Not if I was to
remain at Hogwarts. How I wish that I could have found a way to
leave it. You don't know how much I longed to seek for for you
myself! But that would have been folly, for though Dumbledore
trusts me, the Aurors do not. I did not think you would wish me to
lead them to you. I have said enough. Do as you will."
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive