[HPforGrownups] Snape, Lucius, and missing DE's (was: Re: Snape and the P...

[SnapesSlytherin at aol.com]

No: HPFGUIDX 47328

In a message dated 11/26/02 7:08:17 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
Audra1976 at aol.com writes:

> Regarding the three missing DE's, I'm sorry, but I think it really *is* that 
> 
> simple.  It's Barty Crouch, Karkaroff, and Snape.  If he was actually 
> referring to Bagman as one of them, as some people proposed, then why would 
> 
> he leave out any of the other three?  
> 
The only problem I have with that is that it's *so* obvious.  The thing that 
makes HP wicked is that nothing is ever what it seems.  The skinny boy that 
lives under the stairs is a powerful wizard and the pet rat is really a 
traitor in disguise and the malicious teacher is really a good guy - it 
doesn't fit with what we've seen to have the three Death Eaters be the most 
obvious ones...*shrugs* IMHO anyway.  

~*~*~Oryomai~*~*~
Nex est exordium.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]