Somebody please save Ron!
marephraim
htfulcher at comcast.net
Tue Oct 1 12:38:07 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 44744
Well, this was going to address the "Save Ron" thread, but it
also falls into my terror at the thought of Ron's possible death
in one of the future volumes.
bboy_mn writes:
>
> I'm going to stray from Canon [snip] (and) hope Ron does something
so obviously and independently heroic that no one can possibly
ignore him. So heroic, that while still Harry's friend, he is not
basking in Harry's reflected glory.
>[big snip]
> Among chess players, the Philosopher's Stone chess game against
McGonnagall's chess set was the most noble, brave, and heroic game
of chess ever played in the entire history of the world.
Having started the opinion request thread because I would be so
heartbroken if Ron were to die (and this thread seems to have spun
off from that), I'd like to put an op in.
Several comments have argued in favour of Ron's death, and bboy_mn
would almost seem to concur, due to indications of Ron's low self-
esteem.
dcyasser notes:
>But what I want to see most in Book 5 is someone to save Ron -- not
necessarily from death, but from a complete absence of self-worth.
I'd submit that Ron has shown a sense of self-worth, despite a
somewhat "Why is everything I own rubbish!" persona (remember that
line?). A person who can make that kind of comment does have a sense
of self-worth (a la, "I deserve better, but I'm not getting it.")
What IS evident in Ron is a lack of competitiveness -- which would
fit with his coming from such a large brood. He's seen Bill and
Charley make their mark in their own ways, watched Percy obsess with
making it, and also observed Fred and George (or is it George and
Fred) opt for avenues of success that they can find personally
fulfilling (and fun!). This all would indicate not a lack of self-
esteem, but a more complex approach to finding his way in life.
O sure, he reckons he's not as good as Percy, or Fred and George,
but here again; he's not competitive. I've known many 'Rons' in my
life and strangely enough they usually seem to make good of
themselves in the end.
And consider Ron's chessmanship. It has been noted that Ron has a
keen sense of strategy. Rightly so. I would rather interpret
Ron's various comments, or JKR's assessments of Ron as being
Harry's (somewhat limited due to age) POV. Sure, Ron fishes for a
compliment when Mad Eye Moody suggests that both Harry and Hermione
would make good Aurors. But I would suggest that in GoF the whole
tantrum episode (so painful to read!) when Harry and Ron are at odds
shows a definite defiance from accepting the two-dimensional
expendable side-kick role.
Katey also notes:
>in SS one of the centaurs says that it's always the innocent who go
first. I think he was referencing the dead unicorn they found in the
forest, but I also think it's foreshadowing.
To the SHIP threads that envision a Harry/Hermione future, I agree
with those who rather expect a Ron/Hermione one. It's quite
typical of boys at the GoF age to be alternately shy, hostile and
dismissive of the one girl they really have strong feelings for. The
comment Hermione makes that `next time ask me first,' which
Ron doesn't get but Harry does, is no indication that Harry is the
more likely ultimate target for Hermione's affection. From
Harry's dispassionate perspective (romantically speaking) it would
be naturally easier for him to see Ron's obvious feelings for
Hermione than Ron would himself at the time. That would tie in with
the comments that JKR would not have spent so much time sub-plotting
a future Ron/Hermione relationship only to kill Ron off in the next
book.
But consider: Ron's jealousy, while obviously evidence of a certain
lack of self worth (or self-confidence in romance, see above), also
indicates here a realization that he should be `good enough'for
Hermione. Ron is coming into his own as an independent person,
recognizing that he has legitimate needs and desires that deserve
fulfillment as much as Harry or anyone else.
Of course, this rambling note presents me with a quandary. Ron's
growing sense of entitlement could well be the very thing others
have suggested (more or less) which will lead to his death. While I
would believe that Ron is already shown to be brave enough to
sacrifice himself for Harry if need be, the desire to stand in his
own sunlight could be the very vehicle He Who Must Not Be Named
could use to ensnare him to his downfall.
And as to the Ron/Hermione SHIP issue (noted above), it would be
typical of JKR's greatness as a writer, in a series that grows
more complex and mature with each volume, to set up the scenario for
the relationship and then have Ron die. The growing sense of realism
and tragedy would easily allow for that. (Has anyone commented on
Voldemort as the ultimate terrorist?)
Again, I fear for Ron's life as the story unfolds. Yet, I defend
him against those who find him needing encouragement. I think those
posts just reveal how much we all love Ron as one of the most
wonderful characters of JKR's imaginative genius.
"htfulcher"
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive