When is AK "necessary"?

heiditandy heidit at netbox.com
Thu Oct 10 19:03:43 UTC 2002


No: HPFGUIDX 45179



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Thorp [mailto:obby at blueyonder.co.uk] 
> Someone else mentioned about Voldemort, and if he could be 
> AK'ed... I would guess that even if he could, the "good guys" 
> wouldn't do it, because it is stooping to Voldemorts level... 
> To draw a real world paralell it would be like decrying the 
> use of landmines, and then planting them yourself.

However, in GoF, Sirius points out that during Voldemort's first reign
of terror, Mr Crouch obtained authorisation for aurors to use
unforgivable curses. He also says that Moody didn't kill unless it was
necessary. Of course, that implies that when it was necessary, Moody did
kill Death Eaters (and possibly others as well). 

So where does that put the dividing line?

Heidi





More information about the HPforGrownups archive