Wizarding world government
Ali
Ali at zymurgy.org
Wed Oct 16 22:10:52 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 45440
--- In HPforGrownups at y..., "Christopher Nuttall"
<christopher_g_nuttall at h...> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Regarding the government of the WW, I think that we can make a few
guesses about the most likely structure, because of the application
of theories from our world that can be carried over to the WW.
>
> For example, the government of the WW must be a fairly basic
democratic with as little interference in the private affairs of its
citizens as possible. The reason, carried over from our world, is
that the wizards are always armed with wands, which can be used as
offensive weapons. Someone, I forget who but I'll look it up, said
that an armed populace means a democraticy, while an unarmed populace
can be something less repersentive.
I hope that you're not implying that countries where offensive
weapons are not allowed (ie most of Europe) must somehow be less
democratic than those which permit the bearing of arms <g>! You might
cause a little war if that was your intent! Also, we have no
indication as to whether the MoM is elected or is an unelected
bureaucrat. We do not know the extent of the WW democracy, or lack of
it.
>
> Second guess: Democratises don't fight amongst themselves (or at
least I can't think of an example) and therefore there will probably
be no wizarding equivalent of the World Wars.
I'm not sure that I understand you here. Democracies don't fight each
other? Perhaps that would be our dream. Whatever we think about WWII,
it should never be forgotten that Hitler was originally
democratically elected - even if he took totalitarian action after
that point. Whilst we all seek a true democracy, the reality is that
our own democracies also have their pitfalls and are
rarely "democratic" in the original meaning of the word.
>For them, perhaps, there will be no nations, as we understand the
term, but merely administrate centres. Therefore, the concerns from
the 'rule Britannica' thread are simply not valid, the aurors could
cross the boundaries between the administrative centres without
trouble.
We already have evidence that there is a British MoM and a Bulgarian
MoM. We know that British wizards support British teams just as their
muggle counterparts do. This suggests that they still see themselves
as separate nations rather more than simply administrative centres. I
can believe that aurors cross boundaries - with or without local
support, but the fact remains that there are boundaries to cross.
Ali
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive