TBAY(slightly referenced) - Why we care (Re: Hogwarts Student Population)
swimsalone
sally.lasko at colorado.edu
Thu Oct 17 20:10:58 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 45487
Since this debate has been going on for quite a while and I have
only been visiting the site for a few months, excuse this
observation if it has been stated previously.
The idea that a British boarding school is relatively classist
(meaning some monetary and/or social backing is required for
acceptance) should be a foregone conclusion. One does not
simply elbow one's way into a private institution requireing tuition
for attendance. Even in the States, if one intends their child to
attend Exeter or even a non-boarding private high school they
must put their child's name down on a list of students under
consideration and provide the funds for tuition.
Clearly, academic and merit scholarships are available...but this
does not waive the screening or application process in the least,
particularly for prestigeous boarding schools.
While Hogwarts clearly conforms to the British education model,
the fact that the piteously poor Weasleys can afford to send 5 of
their children through concurrently seems to indicate that the
cost is definitely not prohibitive of including the working classes.
In fact, by strict definition, the Weasleys fall under the rubric of
"working class" since they obviously have no savings (as
evidenced by their sadly empty Gringott's vault) and are living
paycheck to paycheck. One's status in the ministry is of little
importance when Mr. Weasley clearly has little social power or
respect among the rich and influential within the ministry.
I woud argue that of course a Boarding school is somewhat
elitist, but the presence of the Weasleys seems to indicate that
this elitist element is extremely unimportant (except to Ron who
feels quite put-upon to be poor in a school packed with
privileged children) in the long run.
I believe the discussion is really taking issue with a system of
education that is rather elitist, of which Hogwarts happens to be
a part, rather than Hogwarts as an autonomous entity.
Even the Dursleys were planning to send Harry to the public
non-boarding high school to save the cost of tuition while Dudly
was off to Smeltings. Under this system it is far more likely for
those with less social standing or financial resources to send
their children to public schools rather than prestigeous boarding
schools. One cannot view Hogwarts independently from the
long-established system of education in which it is mired. It's
just not logical.
--Sally
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive