[HPforGrownups] Second Daughter Theory

[Lee]

No: HPFGUIDX 45493

> Thursday, October 17, 2002, 1:34:27 PM, wynnde1 at aol.com wrote:
> 
> wac> This is great . . . HOWEVER, what if she was called 
> Demeter instead 
> wac> (same
> wac> goddess, just the Greek version)? Then, she would fit in 
> with that lovely 
> wac> alphabetical Weasley naming scheme, as well! Right 
> between Charlie and Percy, 
> wac> erm . . . Edward, or Eggbert or whatever his REAL name 
> is meant to be! <G>
> 
> Ooooo!  Good point!  But if the alphabetical thing is valid, 
> why does it break down with Ron and Ginny?
> 
> -- 
> Dave

Maybe the Weasleys had a whole slew of
miscarried/aborted/killed/adopted/kidnapped children during the space
between George and Ron? And then a whole lot more between Ron and Ginny
(so manny that they either had to restart the alphabet)

Hey... It could happen!

I think the alphabetic naming thing is all a big fat red herring anyway,
and the almost-legendary missing Weasley will turn out to be someone we
find out about, but dismiss because of their name.

-LD

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.401 / Virus Database: 226 - Release Date: 09/10/2002