Blood Confusion: was- Who ...Potters?
punkieshazam
punkieshazam at yahoo.com
Wed Oct 30 20:14:13 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 45949
<Considerable snippage>
bboy_mn wrote:
> Point- the is no absolute definition of a 'mudblood'.
This is true. The entire point JKR is making IMO, is that mudblood is
intended as an epithet, just as the *n* word is in English. It could
in cases of extreme vexation be used against a pureblood such as
Arthur Weasley by any of the Malfoys--although that falls into the
category of *mudblood lover*.
Punkie
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive