Trewlawney's Prediction
greg_a126
grega126 at aol.com
Mon Sep 2 06:20:48 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 43479
--- In HPforGrownups at y..., "smellee17" <smellee17 at h...> wrote:
> Hello all. New to the group and hoping this hasn't been discussed
> to death already. I think Professor Trewlaneys one and only
other
> true predicton was about Harry being the one to take down
Voldemort.
> Voldemort, upon hearing this, decides to go kill harry while he is
> a baby . In a greek tragedy self-fullfiling prophesy sort of way,
> Voldemort loses all his power. Maybe the reason he would have
> spared Lily Potter. She was unimportant at the moment becuase he
was
> there for Harry. However, he didnt die so maybe Harry will get
him
> later. Just a theory. Smellee17
Yeah, there are basically 2 competing theories. One is the self
fulfilling prophecy angle. The 2nd is that Harry's the descendant
of Gryffindor, & the descendant of Slytherin (Voldemort) is out to
kill him. I've always been a fan of the 2nd option. My main point
has always been that there has to be something special about Harry
that in addition to his mother's love, allowed him to survive the
Killing Curse. Unless the Killing Curse is a completely new
innovation, I refuse to believe that no mother before jumped in
front of it for her son, no husband for his wife, no girlfriend for
her boyfriend when the curse was fired by a jealous ex-lover.
Muggles have been jumping in front of bullets (the Muggle equivalent
to a certain extent, not as deadly but certainly deadly enough) for
each other for years. Has no wizard ever done the same for the
Killing Curse?
Greg
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive