DADA's never-lasting teachers
hp_fan16
hp_fan16 at yahoo.com
Thu Sep 5 01:42:16 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 43629
In reply to my "why didn't Dumbledore teach DADA
Marcus says:
> Perhaps because he was better at transfiguration. Or it could be
> that you simply cannot fake transfiguration. You can go a fair way
> in DADA with just book learning, but not transfiguration.
And after my questioning Snape's position he also responds:
>
> (1) I am convinced that Snape *loves* potions and would fight the
> appointment to DADA.
> (2) If you get the potions wrong, it would likely prove very
deadly.
> Simply no room for incompentance here.
> (3) The teacher must not only know the potions, but know what went
> wrong if and when it does, and the proper antidotes for both the
true
> potion and its mistakes.
>
> Marcus
>
I think Perhaps my point was lost. What I was really concerned about
was the importance of DADA at Hogwarts. Potions and Transfiguration
are no doubt difficult forms of magic, but DADA is as well. I would
think that they could find some teacher that's more competent at
Potions or Transfiguration, then a few of the DADA teachers we've
seen. Is DADA not as important to the WW? It seems we often find
wizards (cough cough FUDGE!) who would rather look the other way,
than put up a defense. Is this something learned by experience at
Hogwarts?
Gabrielle~
Just making my actual point clearer~
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive