SYMBOLISM, MUGGLES AGAINST VOLDEMORT, PROPHECIES, BOGGARTS, ERISED
catlady_de_los_angeles
catlady at wicca.net
Sat Sep 7 21:30:27 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 43760
SYMBOLISM
JOdel wrote:
<< Those boats not only cross the lake, they enter a tunnel and
emerge in an underground cavern all of which are motifs which can
carry heavy symbolic baggage. >>
Now that you mention it, the school-leavers (if Hogwarts is like a
British secondary school) or graduates (if Hogwarts, being the
terminal level of schooling, is like a British university) must LEAVE
via the underground cavern, tunnel, and boat to their new adult lives.
MUGGLES AGAINST VOLDEMORT
Carol wrote:
<< I'm just not too sure what a Muggle could do against a dark wizard
as powerful as Voldemort, not to mention his followers. After all,
even most wizards didn't have much of a chance against him. >>
Muggles could do some things to help the struggle. They don't need
magic to do library research. They can do logic puzzles (as Hermione
pointed out when faced with the Potion bottles logic puzzle), and
they can figure out complicated plots from scattered clues. They
could carry a magical artifact or a bottle of potion that someone
else had made, and throw it at the Death Eaters. JKR has a better
imagination than me and could think of more things.
PROPHECIES
Swimsalone wrote:
<< that James' son would be his downfall, and therefore had to kill
Harry and James. Lily didn't have to die if James was killed, >>
Unless Lily happened to be pregnant with another son at the time.
That is just a nitpick and not a plot suggestion.
Roo Mahoney replied to Doffy99:
<< there is no irony I love more than a self-fulfilling prophecy. >>
Naama wrote:
<< do you think this could be *the* prophecy Dumbledore talks about?
(snip) could Voldemort have known the Potters' son is the appointed
one, and the "go reproduce" order was set against Harry in the first
place? >>
It *could* be, but I prefer to believe that there were multiple
predictions. Voldemort got the one about the boy born near Lammas
1980 and ordered his followers to go out and spawn BECAUSE he didn't
know which boy was the appointed one. If he had known it was the
Potters' son, he wouldn't have bothered with anyone else's son.
Voldemort's followers obeyed him, but the Potters had a son at the
same time without having heard of Voldemort's prediction.
Someone on the Light Side got the one about Harry (according to me,
AFTER Harry had already been born), the one that MIGHT be "the last
of the Potters will destroy Voldemort", and Voldemort heard about it,
so he tried to protect himself by killing Harry and James (and maybe
James's father) as Swimsalone and others have said.
I believe that Harry's unique ability to destroy Voldemort is due
to Voldemort's attack on baby Harry, so it was a self-fulfilling
prophecy as Roo said. I believe that Harry and Voldie got their lives
tangled up together, not just Harry getting Parselmouth, so that
neither can die while the other is alive. So Harry will have to die
in the act of killing Voldie in the final battle in book 7 -- he
will, by that time, know the price he'll pay, and choose to pay it
for the sake of protecting others; just as the self-fulfilling
prophecies are a motif from Classical Greek myth, so dying to save
others is a motif from Christian theology.
I am not committed to the notion that the Potter prophecy was
Trelawney's previous true prophecy. As someone has pointed out,
Dumbledore wouldn't know that Trelawney's prophecy was true until it
had happened, and not yet has the last of the Potters (or James
Potter's son) destoyed the Dark Lord.
Btw, some people argue that Tom Riddle (before becoming an immortal
snake-man) begat James Potter on Mr Grandpa Potter's wife, thus
explaining the physical resemblance and fitting in the popular
grandfather versus grandson motif. (It's in the story of Danae: her
father, whose name I forget, locked her in a tower because of a
prophecy that her son would kill him. Stone walls and iron bars
didn't prevent Zeus from seducing her (in the form of a shower of
gold, said by some to be a reference to bribing the jailors) and her
son was Perseus, who killed Medusa and used Medusa's head to turn his
grandfather to stone.) In that case, James and Harry are not true
Potters and someone else is the last of the Potters -- maybe James's
hypthetical sister's son, who has a different surname? Maybe
Longbottom?
BOGGARTS
Hollydaze! wrote
<< if the boggart were to turn into a real moon then it would partly
destroy the planet (rather worrying idea) >>
I *love* the way you phrased that. Btw, I don't know if you saw that
I referenced your post # 32380 in my post # 42888.
There'snothingto it wrote:
<< What I want to know about boggarts is what would happen if you
faced one and your greatest fear was not something physical. What if
you had a fear of closed spaces or of being alone? What if your
greatest fear was someone finding out you were gay? Or perhaps Ron
Weaslys fear of spiders will be replaced with the fear of Hermione
and the rest of the school finding out how he feels about her? >>
As someone already mentioned, we have already seen that when
Hermione's fear was the abstract fear of doing badly in school, her
Boggart took the form of McGonagall telling her that she had failed
all her exams. I imagine that fear of closed spaces would inspire a
Boggart to take the form of a not-too-large Armoire and come after
you with its door open to capture you inside. Fear of someone finding
out that you were gay, or in love with Hermione, or any other secret,
could induce the Boggart to turn into an issue of DAILY PROPHET or
WITCH WEEKLY with your secret in a Big Headline over a Rita Skeeter
article. Fear of being alone is a little harder: maybe a big mirror
showing you yourself locked in a solitary confinement cell or an
isolation ward with QUARRANTINE signs all over?
SPEAKING OF BIG MIRRORS
Emma_look_alike wrote:
<< predictions about what Dumbledore saw in the Mirror of Erised. He
saw himself holding socks. Perhaps he wants the House Elves to be
free, maybe to help fight Voldemort. (snip) Another thing is that
Dumbledore couldn't have known that Harry would free Dobby with a
sock (it happened in CoS, and the Mirror of Erised was in SS/PS) >>
Maybe Dumbledore's Erised could depict socks for freeing House
Elves because, even tho' Harry has not yet freed Dobby with a
sock, Dumbledore has a premonition about it, or has heard of
someone else freeing a House Elf with a sock. He might want to free
the Hogwarts House Elves and be unable to do so because they won't
accept it.
On another tentacle, one of my friends believes that Dumbledore is a
big Transfigured or disguised House Elf, and sees the socks because
he yearns for his own freedom. She says that he is such a great
wizard because he has House Elf magic, which is very strong: no human
can Apparate at Hogwarts, but Dobby can Pop! without difficulty. She
says Nicholas Flamel is his master, a good master as masters go.
Myself, I don't believe those socks have anything to do with House
Elves. I believe they are a new pair of the extremely ugly and
uncomfortable hand-knit socks his beloved late wife or mother used to
give him for Christmas *every* year, and his true heart's desire is
not the socks themselves, but having the late beloved around to give
them to him. I'm inclined to think it was his wife and she died in
the fight against Grindelwald...
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive