Crouch!Moody's teaching WAS Quirrel's teaching...Dumbledore's aging process

[candlewick]

No: HPFGUIDX 43944


--- Denise wrote:
> I'm with you that
> Quirrel could have been
> a good DADA teacher before his Voldy-years. But as
> to if he continued to
> teach as well after, I'm left wondering this: What
> would be his motivation
> for teaching DADA well, after his Voldification?
> He'd have to teach it
> passably, at least, to remain at Hogwarts and keep
> his cover. But I'd say he
> has a lot of motivation to be a poor teacher. After
> all, the more students
> who are good at defending against the dark arts, the
> higher the danger to
> Voldy and the Death Eaters. One of Quirrel's
> students might just be the next
> super-auror who gets his start under his tutelage.
> Best to keep them less
> well informed, for his boss anyway.


Ok, if this is the case, and I agree with your logic,
by the way, so...why did Fake!Moody teach Harry (and
all his other students, presumably) how to resist the
Imperious Curse?  Voldemort tried to use it on Harry
in the graveyard and Harry was able to fight it
because he'd been given so much practice from
Crouch!Moody.  Was Crouch!Moody just trying to be a
good teacher in order not to blow his cover?


Candlewick

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
http://news.yahoo.com