Pettigrew's choice
annemehr
annemehr at yahoo.com
Wed Apr 9 00:14:25 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 54965
Julie and finwitch, I think you two are arguing in circles because you
are misunderstanding each other's points.
finwitch (on Peter's betrayal):> <But it *is* explained!>
Julie: Oh, I don't disagree that an explanation is offered:
finwitch: Pettigrew himself, explaining:
"He would've killed me! What was there to be gained by
opposing him?"
There. The rat. Survivor. Anything - anything at all, to stay
alive.
Julie: Just because Peter gave an explanation doesn't mean it's an
acceptable one, though. Ultimately, we are responsible for our
choices. Peter *chose* to do what he did.
Annemehr:
Both of you agree that Peter did not, all on his own, get the idea to
join Voldemort and then seek him out. You both agree that *Voldemort*
sought *Peter* out, and that Peter, out of fear, capitulated and
joined him. finwitch is saying that the *explanation* for Peter
working for Voldemort is that he chose to save his own life rather
than refuse to betray his friends.
Julie, I think what you mean is that capitulating because he was
afraid is not a valid *excuse* for what Peter did. It is a valid
*explanation*, though -- i.e. it's the reason for what happened.
Annemehr
donning referee's uniform ;)
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive