[HPforGrownups] Please, no spoilers for book 5

Patricia Bullington-McGuire patricia at obscure.org
Thu Apr 10 03:52:02 UTC 2003


No: HPFGUIDX 55065

On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Trond Michelsen wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 12:33:33AM -0000, Debbie wrote:
> > Have you seen the OoP summary from Scholastic posted at The Leaky 
> > Cauldron? Are we "allowed" to discuss this here?
> 
> I really, really, really, really hope it's not allowed. This thread has
> already revealed too much for my liking. 

I agree.  I'd rather find out what happens when I read the book.  There's 
a difference between speculating on what will happen in Book 5 and being 
told what happens before the we even get a chance to look at it.

If discussion of the summary is going to happen, would people 
pleasepleaseplease put *lots* of spoiler space in the message and use a 
subject line that clearly states the summary is going to be discussed?  


----
Patricia Bullington-McGuire	<patricia at obscure.org>

The brilliant Cerebron, attacking the problem analytically, discovered
three distinct kinds of dragon: the mythical, the chimerical, and the
purely hypothetical.  They were all, one might say, nonexistent, but each
nonexisted in an entirely different way ... 
                -- Stanislaw Lem, "Cyberiad" 





More information about the HPforGrownups archive