[HPforGrownups] Please, no spoilers for book 5
Patricia Bullington-McGuire
patricia at obscure.org
Thu Apr 10 03:52:02 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 55065
On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Trond Michelsen wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 12:33:33AM -0000, Debbie wrote:
> > Have you seen the OoP summary from Scholastic posted at The Leaky
> > Cauldron? Are we "allowed" to discuss this here?
>
> I really, really, really, really hope it's not allowed. This thread has
> already revealed too much for my liking.
I agree. I'd rather find out what happens when I read the book. There's
a difference between speculating on what will happen in Book 5 and being
told what happens before the we even get a chance to look at it.
If discussion of the summary is going to happen, would people
pleasepleaseplease put *lots* of spoiler space in the message and use a
subject line that clearly states the summary is going to be discussed?
----
Patricia Bullington-McGuire <patricia at obscure.org>
The brilliant Cerebron, attacking the problem analytically, discovered
three distinct kinds of dragon: the mythical, the chimerical, and the
purely hypothetical. They were all, one might say, nonexistent, but each
nonexisted in an entirely different way ...
-- Stanislaw Lem, "Cyberiad"
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive