[HPforGrownups] Lucius' age (was Re: Who knows Tom Riddle is Voldemort?)
herm - own - ninny
ratchick22 at hotmail.com
Thu Apr 17 19:31:39 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 55558
>From: IAmLordCassandra at aol.com
>I have to disagree with this a bit-mainly due to a difference in age. >Most
>if not all of the DE's weren't at Hogwarts when Voldemort/Riddle >was
>there...they were there during Snape's time. And, though I can't >find any
>canon at the moment, I suspect that Lucius is included in >that.
It strikes me as odd that Lucius' age is commonly interpreted as either
belonging to the Tom Riddle era or the Marauder's. Draco's quote is CoS
clearly disproves the first suggestion, and I believe he's too old to belong
to the Marauder years because:
1)Draco is the same age as Harry, yet we know that Lily and James were
uncommonly young when they had Harry, which I doubt is the case with Lucius
and Narcissa.
2)Neither Sirius nor Lupin really talk about Lucius (that I can remember). I
would think that if he was in their year they would likely remember him
vividly, as Lucius has the sort of personality that one does not forget.
For example, I think Lupin would make a sympathetic comment to Harry about
Draco and how Lucius was just as nasty at that age, something like that.
If Lucius does in fact belong to an "era" at Hogwarts that coincides with
any of the characters, I'd say it's probably Molly and Arthur Weasley's era.
I have always assumed that Lucius was around the same age as Arthur because
of their deep rooted animosity towards each other. Of course, they didn't
have to attend school together to start hating each other, that could have
happened at any time. It's just that they're obviously long-running enemies
that each know (or have opinions about) the other's social situation,
personality, etc, the kind of knowledge that comes from school years spent
bickering.
On the other hand, The Weasley's first son Charlie is much older than Draco,
and if we go by the Lexicon's timeline, even seems pretty close to the
Marauder's era. This would mean that Molly and Arthur are fairly old, so
perhaps Lucius is not their age afterall. Or perhaps he simply waited awhile
before getting married, or having children. Maybe he did go to school with
the Weasleys, but was a few years behind them. I don't know, does anyone
else think this is plausible, or is it disproven in canon and I'm just
making a fool of myself here :)
dina
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive