Dumbledore and Scabbers, was Re: Worried about Hermione/others
kiricat2001
Zarleycat at aol.com
Tue Apr 22 20:43:10 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 55893
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, Susanne <siskiou at e...> wrote:
>
>
> Maybe I should start looking into the Evil!Dumbledore
> theories ;)
> What name is that going under again?
>
> Or are there any IrresponsibleFool!Dumbledore theories out
> there?
>
> Maybe he's just really sure Pettigrew didn't ever attempt to
> change back to human form during his time at the Weasleys or
> at Hogwarts, for some reason?
>
>
Why would it have mattered whether or not Peter attempted to change
back to human form while at the Weasleys? If he did, obviously Molly
never saw it happen or never came across a strange man roaming around
the house. So, Dumbledore may have assumed that Peter remained in his
rat form. And, after PoA, he's gone off to Voldemort, and Ron knows
who he is, so chances are Peter's not going to go back to the
Weasleys.
If the question now is why didn't Dumbledore ever tell Molly and
Arthur, "Oh, by the way, Scabbers was an Animagus.." my take would be
that he didn't want to have to explain how he knew that, and then
have to answer the Weasley parents' questions - "How do you know
that, Albus?" "Who is he?" "Why did he live with us as a rat for 12
years?"
Maybe this is evidence of Dumbledore the Manipulator, or maybe it's
Dumbledore trying to protect Sirius. After all, saying Scabbers is
Peter Pettigrew inevitably would lead to questions about Sirius, and
maybe Dumbledore figured it would be best to keep that quiet until
such time as Peter can be presented alive to the authorities as proof
of Sirius' innocence. Plus, since everyone is so convinced of Sirius'
guilt, this whole Peter-as-Animagus story sounds like a fairy tale.
Unless you have the man/rat right in front of you as proof.
Marianne
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive