Hermione's rude comment (Lavendar and Parvati on Hermione)
feetmadeofclay
feetmadeofclay at yahoo.ca
Fri Aug 1 12:43:56 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 74654
> Well, let me phrase my thought in another way. You're a thirteen
> year old girl. Two girls that you DO NOT like by any stretch of
> the imagination are dreamily talking about a guy they think is
> soooooo cute.... sigh.
Excuse me but why should Hermione hate Parvati and Lavendar? They
haven't done anything much to her other than not really be her friend
and that is hardly cruel. Simply they aren't alike I know in most
schools girls like that would be cruel little snots and mock Hermione
or make her life hellish. But fact is that hasn't happened at
Hogwarts. And likewise Neville is treated rather nicely. The only
girl who mocks Hermione is Pansey.
So why should Hermione mock them? They didn't seem to mock her for
having a crush on Lockhart. And really wasn't that the same thing?
>> "Oh, I don't know. I don't think he's so great." "What do you
> MEAN?? He's the dreamiest!" they squeal at you.
But Hermione added a snide racist comment to the mix.
Pippin: NO!" Hermione screamed. "Harry, don't trust him, he's been
helping Black get into the castle, he wants you dead too--*he's a
werewolf*!" (emphasis Rowling's)
Try changing "werewolf" to the ethnic signifier of your choice and
see how it sounds.
I think Rowling is trying to show us just how insidious prejudice
is. Even a well-meaning person like Hermione can fall prey to
stereotyping.
Golly: But then it really doesn't work as a lesson because Rowling
never pulls it through for us. With the werewolf we learn that
Hermione was wrong and this was before she stopped entirely trusting
her schoolbooks. Hermione now knows better than this. Either that or
her character isn't growing at all. Which is the worse literary
sin?
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive