Hermione's rude comment
Wanda Sherratt
wsherratt3338 at rogers.com
Fri Aug 1 17:06:36 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 74711
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "The Crashing Boar"
<crashing.boar at n...> wrote:
>> I do think that this scene may have been meant to help
illustrate some of the points raised in other parts of the book,
like how did Umbridge manage to get so many of her petty,
restrictive and discriminatory laws passed before she came to
Hogwarts? Perhaps the biggest fault with it is that it was too
subtle.
>
I would like to believe that this is the case, but I don't. Rowling
is not a subtle writer. When she wants us to get a point, she tells
it to us, often over and over. When Draco called Hermione a
mudblood, there was immediate outrage, a brawl, and the discussion
of the insult went on into the next scene. When Snape called Lily
the same, he was immediately shouted down, insulted in turn by Lily,
and then handed a further beating by James. If Rowling were trying
to say something negative about Hermione's character, someone would
have reacted to her comments about Firenze. Nobody did. I think
that we are giving Rowling more credit for deep thinking than she
deserves. It looks to me like she thought of Hermione's remarks as
a "zinger", putting the other girls in their place, and that was
it. It obviously worked for some, but to me, the putdown is
strangely out of place, given Hermione's background and the themes
in the books up until now.
Wanda
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive