Nasty thought - Harry's destiny PoA

[severusbook4]

No: HPFGUIDX 76114

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "ajlboston" <ajlboston at y...> 
wrote:
> --- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "sarah_haining" 
> <sarahlizzy at h...> wrote: we know that 
> > it is against one of the strictest Wizarding laws to go back and 
> > alter time - it simply should not be done unless under very 
> > safe/strict circumstances. 
> > thus, Sirius was destined to die. He was 
> > supposed to die that night at the hands (sorry, mouth ;) of the 
> > Dementors. 
> > who else was supposed to die that night? Who else was about to 
be 
> > kissed? Harry. Harry is also living on time that, by rights, 
> > shouldn't be his. Is his time also going to run out soon?
> 
> Well, if Buckbeak dies soon, then we could be worried.
> 
> (Wasn't there a bad movie out about this concept this past year?)
> 
> A.J.

A.J. That movie was Final Destination and no Harry and Buckbeak are 
not living on borrowed time, the time shift was supposed to happen.  
What I am saying is Harry and Hermione use of the time shifter or 
whatever it is called, was suppossed to happen, and they are living 
as they were destined to. If you think that everything is prewritten 
by some all powerful deity, then once again the time shift was to 
happen also.  If you are a believer of "we make our own destinies by 
the choices we make" then once again it comes to they are not living 
on borrowed time, because they chose to use the time shifter to save 
Harry, Buckbeak, and Sirius from the dementors and the executioner. 
Anyway you look at it, the next book hopefully will not be a bad 
spin on that horrid movie.

Severus "I'm gothic, so I'm suppossed to act this way." Snape