Clothes under robes, kilts (was Re: Snape's nationality and worst memory)
marika_thestral
marika_thestral at yahoo.se
Sat Aug 9 11:46:01 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 76267
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "president0084"
<president0084 at y...> wrote:
> Frankie <speedygonzo242 at h...> wrote:
> <snip>
> in order for him to be flipped
> upside down and wind up with his pants on display, I submit that
> Snape is the offspring of an obscure Scottish clan
> <snip>
> Wearing clothes under the robes seems to come about from the film,
not
> the book. If they wear normal clothes under the robes, why bother
at
> all with the robes? Secondly on the train, why would Hermione leave
> when the boys change into their robes if they are only putting them
on
> over their normal clothes?
>
> "president0084"
I don't get why so many of you find it weird that Snape doesn't
wear trousers under his robes, when nobody in the book seems to find
it weird. I mean, it's warm outside - the girls are even taking their
shoes and socks off. I certainly don't wear long underwear under a
dress in summertime, and I can assure you that I don't go around
worrying about the possibility of anyone lifting me upside down to
expose my (not greyening) underwear :-)
Marika
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive