Clothes under robes, kilts (was Re: Snape's nationality and worst memory)

marika_thestral marika_thestral at yahoo.se
Sat Aug 9 11:46:01 UTC 2003


No: HPFGUIDX 76267

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "president0084" 
<president0084 at y...> wrote:
> Frankie <speedygonzo242 at h...> wrote:
> <snip>
> in order for him to be flipped 
> upside down and wind up with his pants on display, I submit that 
> Snape is the offspring of an obscure Scottish clan 

> <snip>

> Wearing clothes under the robes seems to come about from the film, 
not 
> the book. If they wear normal clothes under the robes, why bother 
at 
> all with the robes? Secondly on the train, why would Hermione leave 
> when the boys change into their robes if they are only putting them 
on 
> over their normal clothes?
> 
> "president0084"

I don't get why so many of you find it weird that Snape doesn't 
wear trousers under his robes, when nobody in the book seems to find 
it weird. I mean, it's warm outside - the girls are even taking their 
shoes and socks off. I certainly don't wear long underwear under a 
dress in summertime, and I can assure you that I don't go around 
worrying about the possibility of anyone lifting me upside down to 
expose my (not greyening) underwear :-)
 
Marika







More information about the HPforGrownups archive