Paintings vs. Photos
Hagrid
aussie_lol at yahoo.com.au
Wed Aug 13 01:00:58 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 76795
> mtwelovett asked:
> > There certainly seems to be a difference in photos and paintings
--- "o_caipora" wrote:
> I think that Dumbledore's comment on not being taken off Chocolate
> Frog cards is merely Rowling's reuse of a bon mot, one with which
> she is certainly familiar, and which pithily expresses the value
> placed on honors by a man who is above pretension.
>
> In computer terms, I'd say that a wizard photo is something a
> little more sophistcated than an animated GIF in that it responds
> in a limited way to limited stimuli, while a portrait is like an AI
> program, but far beyond anything now existing. As to the nature
> of "portrait space", it confuses me but I assume it's been
> explained here before. >>>
Paintings join in conversattions - Photos act like home videos.
Harry's parents would do something more than just wave to him
otherwise.
So can a painting be done post-mortum to have some interaction with
those wizards/witches? Could Harry commision a painting to be done of
James, Lily and Sirius? (or has this been asked before?)
Norbert's Mummy / aussie
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive