Snape Vampire Theory: Where did this come from?

koinonia02 Koinonia2 at hotmail.com
Thu Aug 14 02:54:39 UTC 2003


No: HPFGUIDX 77043

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "subrosax99" <subrosax at e...> 
wrote:

> Exactly. How is Snape supposed to be in danger from LV if he is 
> undead?!! Other than a well positioned stake through the heart, 
it's 
> not as if he can be killed. Where then is the danger? 

"K":
Vampires can be done away with. They can be killed. Stake through the 
heart, the head cut off, etc. 


>If Snape was so 
> hot for LV in the beginning, why didn't he just turn him into a 
> vampire? That would have quickly dispensed with the whole eternal 
> life problem.

"K":
Because Voldemort has vampiric qualities also. It was Voldemort who 
went on a quest for immortality and who seems to be familiar with 
vampires. He seems to be the main connection to those creatures.

> 
> I agree also that Snape has more than enough going on without being 
a 
> vampire to boot.

"K":
Such as? Could not being a vampire be the root of most of his 
problems? I guess we could say the same for Hagrid and Lupin.


>Could some of this be movie contamination? The sight 
> of Rickman dressed up like Ichabod Crane in a scuzzy Trent Reznor 
wig 
> surely hasn't helped matters much. (Not that I'm complaining about 
> Rickman, mind you.) Again, I agree; it's too much goth.

"K":
Not from me. I'm not a big fan of the movies as it is. The vampire 
theory has been around for a lot longer than any of the movies.


"K"
v-v





More information about the HPforGrownups archive