Snape Vampire Theory: Where did this come from?
koinonia02
Koinonia2 at hotmail.com
Thu Aug 14 02:54:39 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 77043
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "subrosax99" <subrosax at e...>
wrote:
> Exactly. How is Snape supposed to be in danger from LV if he is
> undead?!! Other than a well positioned stake through the heart,
it's
> not as if he can be killed. Where then is the danger?
"K":
Vampires can be done away with. They can be killed. Stake through the
heart, the head cut off, etc.
>If Snape was so
> hot for LV in the beginning, why didn't he just turn him into a
> vampire? That would have quickly dispensed with the whole eternal
> life problem.
"K":
Because Voldemort has vampiric qualities also. It was Voldemort who
went on a quest for immortality and who seems to be familiar with
vampires. He seems to be the main connection to those creatures.
>
> I agree also that Snape has more than enough going on without being
a
> vampire to boot.
"K":
Such as? Could not being a vampire be the root of most of his
problems? I guess we could say the same for Hagrid and Lupin.
>Could some of this be movie contamination? The sight
> of Rickman dressed up like Ichabod Crane in a scuzzy Trent Reznor
wig
> surely hasn't helped matters much. (Not that I'm complaining about
> Rickman, mind you.) Again, I agree; it's too much goth.
"K":
Not from me. I'm not a big fan of the movies as it is. The vampire
theory has been around for a lot longer than any of the movies.
"K"
v-v
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive