[HPforGrownups] Dumbledore's attention to Harry an ammends for past mistakes?
Michaela Ross
kodiak6of9 at yahoo.com
Thu Aug 14 18:54:10 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 77175
lupinwolf2001 <lupinwolf2001 at yahoo.com> wrote:
We know that Dumbledore watches over Harry. We know that he protects
him while at the same time must prep him for being "the one" (so to
speak).
But for all of that... for all of the attention given to a promising
student like Harry, where was all that when Tom Riddle was at
Hogwarts?
Is Dumbledore somewhat making ammends (through his actions with
Harry) for the attention he didn't give Tom Riddle? Could Dumbledore
have made a profound difference in an adolesant young Riddle? I would
imagine that it would have. While Dumbledore was not yet the
headmaster, it seems that he had more contact with Tom (as a teacher)
than most headmasters would.
I can't believe that in some fashion, Dumbledore doesn't hold himself
partly responsible for failing to recognize or make a difference with
Tom Riddle to stop him becoming something abhorrantly evil like
Voldemort.
If Harry is REALLY supposed to "kill" voldemort with "love" are we
then to conclude that he will "save" Tom Riddle with "love"?
Either way, this is a pretty profound statement to assert how big of
a difference love and attention can make in two similar lives. And
why, was Dumbledore inacapable of making a positive difference in the
life of Tom Riddle?
It was said that Dumbledore "saw through" Tom, maybe he knew all along that he was destined for evil.
Michaela
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive