Snape Vampire Theory: Where did this come from?
Sydney
sydpad at yahoo.com
Fri Aug 15 00:11:05 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 77235
I wrote:
> >
> > Also, sunlight, garlic, yadda yadda... the main point of vampires is
> > that they're UNDEAD. They don't age or die. I'm not a vampire fan,
> > but a mortal vampire isn't a vampire in my book, it's just someone
> who
> > drinks blood.
> >
> > Sydney
Allyson replies:
> Exactly. How is Snape supposed to be in danger from LV if he is
> undead?!! Other than a well positioned stake through the heart, it's
> not as if he can be killed. Where then is the danger? If Snape was so
> hot for LV in the beginning, why didn't he just turn him into a
> vampire? That would have quickly dispensed with the whole eternal
> life problem.
That's not even my main problem with the undead thing. It's the
aging. We've now seen Snape as child, as a teenager, aging perfectly
normally. That's just not undead. If the point of Vampires is that
they have somthing to do with immortality, then what's with the
parents, the childhood, the aging?
I'm wondering if Lupin's Vampire-tease may not have been related to
Snape having had some vampire-thing in school-- I mean beeing keen on
them or wanting to be one. <wrinkles nose> It's not a great
explanation, but I've been trying to think of some other Snape/Vampire
connection and that's the best I could come up with.
Sydney
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive