Pondering that Secret Keeper thing

meltowne meltowne at yahoo.com
Mon Aug 18 14:14:20 UTC 2003


No: HPFGUIDX 77792

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "melclaros" <melclaros at y...> 
wrote:
 
> See this is where I start to get confused.
> "Nose against the window". So THIS person can see a house just not 
> who is in it. Those who haven't been told the location of the HQ 
> can't see the house.
> 
> I'm guessing that it all depends on precisly how the secret itself 
is 
> worded. The Potter's secret only hid THEM since from what Flitwick 
> said it did not neccessarily hide thier HOUSE. The HQ IS a house 
and 
> so the whole thing becomes hidden. That's the best I can come up 
with 
> so far.

This would perhaps explain why James and Lily couldn't be their own 
secret keepers.  If someone can't see you because they haven't been 
told the secret, how can you tell them?  Someone who is not being 
hidden must tell them.

Dumbledore is able to be the Order's secret keeper because it is the 
house, not DD who is being hidden.

My questin is how Dumbledore, Hagrid, and anyone else knew where the 
house was?  Hagrid had to be let in on the secret to be able to get 
Harry after the attack, but Hagrid didn't really know much in terms 
of details.

Did PP give Serius a series of notes to give to the appropriate 
people telling them where J&L were hiding?  If he didn't, how did 
they know where to find them?





More information about the HPforGrownups archive