Pondering that Secret Keeper thing
meltowne
meltowne at yahoo.com
Mon Aug 18 14:14:20 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 77792
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "melclaros" <melclaros at y...>
wrote:
> See this is where I start to get confused.
> "Nose against the window". So THIS person can see a house just not
> who is in it. Those who haven't been told the location of the HQ
> can't see the house.
>
> I'm guessing that it all depends on precisly how the secret itself
is
> worded. The Potter's secret only hid THEM since from what Flitwick
> said it did not neccessarily hide thier HOUSE. The HQ IS a house
and
> so the whole thing becomes hidden. That's the best I can come up
with
> so far.
This would perhaps explain why James and Lily couldn't be their own
secret keepers. If someone can't see you because they haven't been
told the secret, how can you tell them? Someone who is not being
hidden must tell them.
Dumbledore is able to be the Order's secret keeper because it is the
house, not DD who is being hidden.
My questin is how Dumbledore, Hagrid, and anyone else knew where the
house was? Hagrid had to be let in on the secret to be able to get
Harry after the attack, but Hagrid didn't really know much in terms
of details.
Did PP give Serius a series of notes to give to the appropriate
people telling them where J&L were hiding? If he didn't, how did
they know where to find them?
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive