Harry "always gets away with stuff" (Was Re: Defending Ron ?...)
C M
cmurph18 at yahoo.com
Mon Aug 18 16:23:56 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 77808
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "annemehr" <annemehr at y...>
wrote:
>>>Harry could no more help blowing up Aunt Marge, as hard as he
tried, than Ron could ever help his ears turning red when he's
upset.<<<
Me: I don't think that's necessarily true. Harry *was* responsible
for Aunt Marge blowing up; he failed to control his temper. He seemed
fully aware that he had done something wrong, too. My impression has
always been that any emotion-produced Magic a child does pre-Hogwarts
is overlooked by the MoM, but once the child is aware of who/what
they are, they have a responsibility to keep their powers in check.
In PoA, Harry didn't do that. Honestly, of all the Restriction-
breaking he's gotten in trouble for (CoS's pudding, OOP's Patronus),
blowing up Aunt Marge is the only one that's valid and he *did* "get
away with it." It was blown off completely due to the Sirius Black
situation.
>>>annemehr: In justice, uncontrolled magic should never be
punished.<<<
Me: I disagree. If Harry had started punching or kicking Aunt Marge
when he lost his temper, it would have been just as wrong as what he
did. Not holding him responsible for Magic he does in the heat of
anger would send the message that it's "okay," that because he's a
wizard, he deserves preferential treatment. And while many in the WW
would agree, the prevailing attitude of their government seems to be
on the other side of that fence.
I personally don't think there was anything sinister in Ron's remark.
Harry *does* get away with stuff (Aunt Marge, flying when Madame
Hooch left in SS), but that's not a bad thing, is it? I assume that
most of us cheer for him at those moments (as Ron and the rest of
Weasleys did in OOP). He's the hero, we want things to go his way.
CM, who loves it when things work out in Harry's favor.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive