[HPforGrownups] Re: Wizards, witches, warlocks, and hags ...

EnsTren at aol.com EnsTren at aol.com
Mon Aug 18 20:19:59 UTC 2003


No: HPFGUIDX 77855

In a message dated 8/18/2003 4:15:18 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
crashing.boar at ntlworld.com writes:

>  From: Garrett 
>  To: HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com 
>  <<<snip>>>> at the beginning of PoA, it talks about the clientele passing 
>  >through the inn and mentions warlocks and hags as distinct types of 
>  >people -- any thoughts on how they might differ from 
>  >witches/wizards? Is there canon on this that I've overlooked?
>  >
>  <<<snip>>>> Rebecca
> 
>  I think Warlocks are just the Wizards in a high postition of power.
>  Garrett
> 
>  ----------------------------
> 
>  Warlock is actually defined as 'oath-breaker', and as hag is another 
> derogatory word, I would think they were more the rougher, subclass of the WW.
> 
>  Dawn
> 

Perhaps it used to mean oath breaker and now it means politician?  Or 
something of the sort


Nemi
       --Black Dragon
       --Slasher and Yaoist
       --Utterly Psycotic


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





More information about the HPforGrownups archive