[HPforGrownups] Re: Wizards, witches, warlocks, and hags ...
EnsTren at aol.com
EnsTren at aol.com
Mon Aug 18 20:19:59 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 77855
In a message dated 8/18/2003 4:15:18 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
crashing.boar at ntlworld.com writes:
> From: Garrett
> To: HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com
> <<<snip>>>> at the beginning of PoA, it talks about the clientele passing
> >through the inn and mentions warlocks and hags as distinct types of
> >people -- any thoughts on how they might differ from
> >witches/wizards? Is there canon on this that I've overlooked?
> >
> <<<snip>>>> Rebecca
>
> I think Warlocks are just the Wizards in a high postition of power.
> Garrett
>
> ----------------------------
>
> Warlock is actually defined as 'oath-breaker', and as hag is another
> derogatory word, I would think they were more the rougher, subclass of the WW.
>
> Dawn
>
Perhaps it used to mean oath breaker and now it means politician? Or
something of the sort
Nemi
--Black Dragon
--Slasher and Yaoist
--Utterly Psycotic
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive